CVE-2026-42208
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLiteLLM is a proxy server (AI Gateway) to call LLM APIs in OpenAI (or native) format. From version 1.81.16 to before version 1.83.7, a database query used during proxy API key checks mixed the caller-supplied key value into the query text instead of passing it as a separate parameter. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted Authorization header to any LLM API route (for example POST /chat/completions) and reach this query through the proxy's error-handling path. An attacker could read data from the proxy's database and may be able to modify it, leading to unauthorised access to the proxy and the credentials it manages. This issue has been patched in version 1.83.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLiteLLM versions 1.81.16 through 1.83.6 contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the proxy's API key validation logic. The query builder incorrectly interpolates the caller-supplied Authorization header value directly into SQL query text rather than using parameterized queries, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to inject arbitrary SQL commands through the error-handling path on any LLM API route.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.81.16, < 1.83.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify LiteLLM installation and versionRun 'pip show litellm' or check your package manager to retrieve the installed LiteLLM version numberAffected if The installed version is >= 1.81.16 and < 1.83.7
-
Confirm database backend is in useReview LiteLLM configuration files (typically config.yaml or environment variables) for database connection settings such as DATABASE_URL, LITELLM_DB_URI, or similar database backend configurationsAffected if A relational database backend (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, etc.) is configured and connected to LiteLLM
-
Verify API routes are exposedCheck if LLM API routes (such as /v1/chat/completions, /v1/completions, or similar) are accessible on the proxy server, as the vulnerability is exploited through these error-handling pathsAffected if The LiteLLM proxy API endpoints are exposed and reachable by unauthenticated attackers
-
Check Authorization header processingReview server logs or network traffic for any Authorization header values being processed, as the vulnerability involves direct concatenation of these values into SQL queriesAffected if Authorization headers are being processed and logged by the LiteLLM proxy server
If LiteLLM version is between 1.81.16 and 1.83.7 inclusive, a relational database is configured, and API routes are exposed, the environment is likely affected by this SQL injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.83.7
Upgrade LiteLLM to version 1.83.7 or later to remediate the SQL injection vulnerability. After upgrading, verify that API key validation and database access patterns function correctly.
1.83.7
- Identify current Litellm version by checking your deployment configuration or running `litellm --version`
- Stop the Litellm proxy service to prevent during-upgrade access
- Upgrade Litellm to version 1.83.7 or later using your package manager (e.g., `pip install litellm==1.83.7` or `uv pip install litellm==1.83.7`)
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully by checking the installed version
- Restart the Litellm proxy service
- Test that the proxy routes (e.g., POST /chat/completions) function correctly with valid API keys
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,144.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42208 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42208 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data