CVE-2026-42231
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedn8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to versions 1.123.32, 2.17.4, and 2.18.1, a flaw in the xml2js library used to parse XML request bodies in n8n's webhook handler allowed prototype pollution via a crafted XML payload. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows could exploit this to pollute the JavaScript object prototype and, by chaining the pollution with the Git node's SSH operations, achieve remote code execution on the n8n host. This issue has been patched in versions 1.123.32, 2.17.4, and 2.18.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA prototype pollution vulnerability in the xml2js library used to parse XML request bodies in n8n's webhook handler allows authenticated users with workflow permissions to inject malicious properties into JavaScript object prototypes via crafted XML payloads. Chaining this with the Git node's SSH operations enables remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.123.32>= 2.17.0, < 2.17.4= 2.18.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed n8n versionRun `n8n --version` or check the version in package.json, Docker container labels, or the n8n UI footerAffected if The version is less than 1.123.32, or between 2.17.0 and 2.17.3 inclusive, or exactly 2.18.0
-
Confirm xml2js is in useCheck if xml2js is listed in the n8n installation dependencies: run `npm list xml2js` in the n8n directory or examine the package-lock.jsonAffected if xml2js version is present and the webhook handler processes XML payloads
-
Verify webhook handler is accessibleCheck if webhooks are enabled in n8n settings. Look for webhook URLs in the UI under Settings > Webhooks or in individual workflow configurationsAffected if Webhooks are enabled and reachable by authenticated users
-
Check for Git node usageInspect workflow configurations for Git node instances. Look for workflows that use the Git node with SSH operations enabledAffected if Git node with SSH operations is configured in any active workflow
-
Review user role permissionsExamine n8n user roles and permissions. Specifically check if any non-admin users have workflow creation or execution permissionsAffected if Users other than administrators have workflow permissions, allowing them to craft the exploit payload
You are affected if your n8n version is in the vulnerable ranges AND webhooks process XML AND users with workflow permissions can access the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.123.322.17.4
Upgrade n8n to version 1.123.32, 2.17.4, or 2.18.1 which contain the patched xml2js library. Additionally, restrict workflow creation/modification permissions to trusted users only.
1.123.32 (for 1.x users), 2.17.4 (for 2.17.x users), or 2.18.1 (for 2.18.0 users)
- Identify your current n8n version by checking the running container or installation
- If using version 1.x: Upgrade to version 1.123.32 or later
- If using version 2.17.x: Upgrade to version 2.17.4 or later
- If using version 2.18.0: Upgrade to version 2.18.1 or later
- For Docker installations: Pull the new image (e.g., docker pull n8nio/n8n:1.123.32) and recreate the container
- For npm installations: Run 'npm install -g n8n@latest' or specify the version (e.g., 'npm install -g [email protected]')
- For self-hosted installations: Follow your platform's standard upgrade procedure
- After upgrade, verify the n8n service is running correctly and test webhook functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42231 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42231 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data