CVE-2026-42257
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNet::IMAP implements Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP) client functionality in Ruby. Prior to versions 0.4.24, 0.5.14, and 0.6.4, several Net::IMAP commands accept a raw string argument that is sent to the server without validation or escaping. If this string is derived from user-controlled input, it may contain contain CRLF sequences, which an attacker can use to inject arbitrary IMAP commands. This issue has been patched in versions 0.4.24, 0.5.14, and 0.6.4.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNet::IMAP Ruby library versions prior to 0.4.24, 0.5.14, and 0.6.4 contain a CRLF injection vulnerability. Multiple IMAP commands accept raw string arguments that are sent to the server without validation or escaping, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary IMAP commands via CRLF sequences in user-controlled input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.4.24>= 0.5.0, < 0.5.14>= 0.6.0, < 0.6.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Net::IMAP gem versionRun `gem list net-imap` or add `puts Net::IMAP::VERSION` in Ruby code to see the installed versionAffected if Version is < 0.4.24, OR >= 0.5.0 and < 0.5.14, OR >= 0.6.0 and < 0.6.4
-
Inspect Gemfile or gemspec for Net::IMAP version constraintLook for `gem 'net-imap'` or `spec.add_runtime_dependency 'net-imap'` entries and compare the version requirement to the affected rangesAffected if The declared version falls within any of the affected ranges listed above
-
Identify if application code passes user input to Net::IMAP commandsSearch codebase for Net::IMAP method calls like `login`, `authenticate`, `append`, `copy`, `move`, `store`, `select`, `examine`, `create`, `delete`, `rename`, `subscribe`, `unsubscribe`, `list`, `lsub`, `status`, or `idle` and trace whether external input (params, headers, body) flows into these callsAffected if User-controlled or external data is passed directly as arguments to any IMAP command without sanitization
-
Check for custom IMAP command execution patternsSearch for `send_command`, `raw`, or similar methods that construct IMAP commands dynamically, and verify if string interpolation or concatenation is used with unsanitized inputAffected if The application builds custom IMAP commands using string concatenation with data that originates from external sources
You are affected if your installed Net::IMAP version is within the vulnerable ranges AND your application passes external input to IMAP command methods without validation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.4.240.5.140.6.4
Upgrade Net::IMAP to version 0.4.24, 0.5.14, or 0.6.4 or later. Additionally, validate and sanitize any user-controlled input before passing it to IMAP commands as a defense-in-depth measure.
net-imap version 0.4.24, 0.5.14, or 0.6.4 depending on your current version branch; generally upgrade to the latest stable release that includes the fix
- Identify the current Net::IMAP version in your project by checking your Gemfile or gemspec file
- Determine which version branch you are currently on (0.4.x, 0.5.x, or 0.6.x)
- Run `bundle update net-imap` to update to the latest version in your current branch, or manually specify the fixed version
- If using RubyGems directly, run `gem install net-imap` to get the latest version
- Verify the installed version matches the fixed release (0.4.24, 0.5.14, or 0.6.4)
- Run your test suite to ensure compatibility
- Deploy the updated gem
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42257 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42257 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data