Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2026-42317

HIGH · 7.0 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-06-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
76/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 0.78 and prior to versions 10.0.25 and 11.0.7, a technician can delete arbitrary files from the filesystem as long as the webserver has write rights on them. Upgrade to 10.0.25 or 11.0.7 to receive a patch.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

GLPI contains an arbitrary file deletion vulnerability allowing authenticated technicians to delete arbitrary files on the filesystem where the webserver has write permissions. The vulnerability stems from improper authorization or path validation in the application.

MitigationUpgrade GLPI to version 10.0.25 or 11.0.7 to receive the patch that addresses the arbitrary file deletion vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify GLPI version
    Locate the version file in your GLPI installation (typically in the root directory or config folder) and read the version number
    Affected if version is 0.78 through 10.0.x before 10.0.25, or 11.x before 11.0.7
  2. Verify technician accounts exist
    Check if any user accounts with technician profile exist in the GLPI user database (glpi_users table with profile linking to technician role)
    Affected if technician-level accounts are present in the system
  3. Check webserver write permissions
    Review filesystem permissions to determine if the webserver process user has write access to directories outside the GLPI application folder
    Affected if webserver user has write permissions to arbitrary filesystem locations
  4. Identify file deletion feature
    Locate and examine the file deletion functionality in GLPI (typically in ticket follow-ups, documents, or attachment handling modules)
    Affected if the document/attachment deletion feature is accessible to technician-level users

Your environment is affected if GLPI version is 0.78 through 10.0.x before 10.0.25 or 11.x before 11.0.7, technician accounts exist, and the webserver process has write access to files outside the GLPI directory.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade GLPI to version 10.0.25 or 11.0.7 to receive the patch that addresses the arbitrary file deletion vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

10.0.25 or 11.0.7

  1. Backup the GLPI database and all files before proceeding with the upgrade
  2. Verify the current installed version matches the affected range (0.78 through versions prior to 10.0.25 or 11.0.7)
  3. Review the official GLPI upgrade documentation for your current version
  4. Download GLPI version 10.0.25 or version 11.0.7 from the official GLPI repository or website
  5. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before applying to production
  6. Execute the upgrade following the documented upgrade procedure
  7. Verify the fix is applied by confirming the technician role can no longer delete arbitrary files outside allowed directories

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42317 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42317 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data