CVE-2026-4232
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was determined in Tiandy Integrated Management Platform 7.17.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /rest/user/getAuthorityByUserId. Executing a manipulation of the argument userId can lead to sql injection. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in Tiandy Integrated Management Platform 7.17.0 allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL queries via the userId parameter in the /rest/user/getAuthorityByUserId endpoint. The vulnerability is exploitable without authentication and has been publicly disclosed.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Tiandy IMP installationLocate the Tiandy Integrated Management Platform installation and determine the installed version number. This is typically found in the application web interface, about page, or system information panel.Affected if The installed version is Tiandy IMP 7.17.0 exactly or falls within the version range containing 7.17.0 (e.g., unpatched versions up to and including 7.17.0)
-
Verify the vulnerable endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the URL path /rest/user/getAuthorityByUserId on the Tiandy IMP web server. This is a REST API endpoint that should respond to HTTP requests.Affected if The endpoint returns any HTTP response (including error responses), indicating it is exposed and reachable
-
Test for SQL injection on userId parameterSend a crafted HTTP GET or POST request to /rest/user/getAuthorityByUserId with a test value in the userId parameter such as a single quote (') or SQL boolean-based payload like ' OR '1'='1 to observe application behavior.Affected if The application returns SQL error messages, exhibits unusual database-related behavior, or the response differs significantly from baseline queries, indicating untrusted input is being passed to the database without proper sanitization
-
Confirm lack of authentication requirementObserve whether the vulnerable endpoint can be accessed without providing any login credentials or valid session token.Affected if The endpoint is reachable and processes requests without requiring authentication, confirming the exploit condition described in the CVE
A user is affected if their Tiandy IMP installation is version 7.17.0 (or an unpatched version containing this release) and the /rest/user/getAuthorityByUserId endpoint with the userId parameter is exposed without authentication.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor patch if available; otherwise implement parameterized queries or input validation on the userId parameter, and consider deploying a WAF as a compensating control until the vulnerability is remediated.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4232 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4232 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data