CVE-2026-42388
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncomplete validation of the SOA record present in a catalog zone might lead to a crash.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a denial-of-service vulnerability in DNS server software where incomplete validation of the SOA (Start of Authority) record present in a catalog zone can cause the server to crash. Catalog zones are used for zone provisioning in DNS implementations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your DNS server softwareRun a command to determine which DNS server software is running (e.g., 'named -v' for BIND, 'dnsserver -v' or check process list, or review system documentation)Affected if The software is a DNS server that supports catalog zones but the version is unknown or unpatched
-
Check if catalog zones are configuredReview your DNS server configuration files for any zone definitions that use the catalog zone schema or 'catalog' zone type. Search for 'catalog' in zone configuration blocks or check for zones with provisioning-related metadataAffected if Catalog zones are defined and loaded on the DNS server
-
Verify the installed version against fixed releasesCompare your installed DNS server version to the vendor-released patched versions for this vulnerability. Check the vendor security advisory for version numbersAffected if The installed version is older than the patched version and catalog zones are in use
-
Check for SOA record validation in catalog zonesIf accessible, review DNS server logs for errors or warnings related to SOA record processing in catalog zones, or test by attempting to add a catalog zone with an intentionally malformed SOA record to observe server behaviorAffected if The server crashes or produces validation errors when processing SOA records in catalog zones
You are affected if your DNS server software supports catalog zones, has catalog zones configured, and is running a version that lacks the fix for incomplete SOA record validation in catalog zones.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-supplied patch or update to the DNS server software to ensure proper validation of SOA records in catalog zones.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42388 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42388 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data