CVE-2026-42400
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated user can send a specially crafted compressed request payload that is processed prior to authorization checks, causing excessive memory and CPU resource consumption that can result in a Kibana instance becoming unresponsive or crashing.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceKibana suffers from uncontrolled resource consumption where an authenticated user can send specially crafted compressed request payloads that are processed before authorization checks, causing excessive memory and CPU consumption leading to denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.19.16>= 9.0.0, < 9.3.5>= 9.4.0, < 9.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Kibana versionRun `kibana --version` or check the version field in the Kibana welcome page, or look at the package.json file in the Kibana installation directoryAffected if The version falls within one of these ranges: >= 8.0.0 and < 8.19.16; >= 9.0.0 and < 9.3.5; >= 9.4.0 and < 9.4.2
-
Verify compressed request payload handling is enabledCheck Kibana configuration file (kibana.yml) for settings related to request body parsing, compression, or payload handling. Look for `server.maxPayload` or similar compression-related settings that may be present and not explicitly disabledAffected if Compressed request handling is enabled (this is typically the default configuration)
-
Confirm authentication is activeVerify that Kibana has authentication configured and enabled. Check that `xpack.security.authc` settings in kibana.yml show authentication providers are configured and activeAffected if Authentication is enabled (which is required for the authenticated user to exploit this vulnerability)
-
Check for evidence of resource exhaustionMonitor Kibana process memory and CPU usage. Look for unusually high resource consumption that correlates with compressed request handling, or review access logs for patterns of compressed requestsAffected if Unusually high memory or CPU usage is observed when processing compressed requests, especially from authenticated users
You are affected if your Kibana version is within any of the affected version ranges AND compressed request handling is enabled AND users are authenticated, as the vulnerability allows authenticated users to exhaust resources via specially crafted compressed payloads processed before authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.19.169.3.59.4.2
Apply vendor patches that implement resource limits on compressed request payload decompression and/or move authorization checks earlier in the request processing pipeline to prevent resource exhaustion.
Kibana 8.19.16+ (for 8.x line), 9.3.5+ (for 9.0-9.3 line), or 9.4.2+ (for 9.4 line)
- 1. Identify the current Kibana version in use using `kibana --version` or the KibanaAbout page
- 2. For Kibana 8.x versions: Plan upgrade to version 8.19.16 or later
- 3. For Kibana 9.0.x - 9.3.x versions: Plan upgrade to version 9.3.5 or later
- 4. For Kibana 9.4.0 - 9.4.1 versions: Plan upgrade to version 9.4.2 or later
- 5. Before upgrading in production, test the new version in a staging environment
- 6. Back up Kibana configuration files (kibana.yml) and any custom dashboards/visualizations
- 7. Perform the upgrade following Elastic's standard upgrade documentation
- 8. After upgrade, verify Kibana starts successfully and is responsive
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42400 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42400 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data