CVE-2026-42406
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems where a highly privileged, authenticated attacker with at least the Certificate Manager role can modify configuration objects that allow running arbitrary commands. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authenticated command injection vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP and BIG-IQ systems. An attacker with the Certificate Manager role can modify certain configuration objects to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying system, effectively achieving code execution through the management interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6= 21.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the F5 BIG-IP software versionRun `tmsh show sys version` or view the System > Software Management > ISO Image page in the management consoleAffected if The version falls within 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, 16.1.0-16.1.6, or exactly 21.0.0
-
Identify users with Certificate Manager roleRun `tmsh list auth user` and look for entries containing 'certificate-manager' in the role attribute, or check User > Certificate Manager in the GUIAffected if Any user account has the Certificate Manager role assigned
-
Review recent audit logs for command executionCheck System > Logs > Audit or run `tmsh show /audit` for entries showing unexpected command execution, especially from users with Certificate Manager roleAffected if Audit logs show arbitrary shell commands executed by a Certificate Manager role user
-
Inspect custom Certificate Manager configuration objectsRun `tmsh list /cm certmanager` and review any custom certificate-related configuration objects for suspicious command injection patterns in fields that accept system commandsAffected if Custom configuration objects contain shell metacharacters or unexpected command sequences
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is in the vulnerable range AND any user account has the Certificate Manager role assigned, allowing potential command injection through certificate-related configuration objects.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply available F5 patches for this vulnerability and review Certificate Manager role permissions to ensure only necessary users have this elevated privilege.
Upgrade to the fixed version specified in F5 advisory for your respective version branch (17.1.x, 17.5.x, 16.1.x, or 21.0.x) - check my.f5.com for exact version numbers
- Check the F5 support portal (my.f5.com) for the specific hotfix or maintenance version that addresses CVE-2026-42406
- Review the F5 advisory for the specific fixed version applicable to your BIG-IP module and version branch
- Plan maintenance window for upgrade - this is a high-privilege vulnerability that allows arbitrary command execution
- Backup current BIG-IP configuration before applying any update
- Apply the recommended hotfix or upgrade to the fixed version for your respective branch (17.1.x, 17.5.x, 16.1.x, or 21.0.x)
- After upgrade, verify that the Certificate Manager role permissions have been properly scoped to prevent unauthorized command execution
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42406 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42406 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data