CVE-2026-42477
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA heap-based out-of-bounds read vulnerability in RWObj_Reader::read in the OBJ file parser in Open CASCADE Technology (OCCT) V8_0_0_rc5 allows user-assisted attackers to cause a denial of service or obtain sensitive information by persuading a victim to open a crafted OBJ file. The issue occurs because Standard_ReadLineBuffer::ReadLine() can return a 1-byte buffer for a minimal OBJ line, and RWObj_Reader::read() calls pushIndices(aLine + 2) without validating the buffer length.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Open CASCADE Technology's OBJ file parser where RWObj_Reader::read() calls pushIndices(aLine + 2) without validating that the buffer returned by Standard_ReadLineBuffer::ReadLine() is at least 3 bytes, allowing attackers to read beyond buffer bounds via crafted OBJ files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.9.3= 8.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Open CASCADE Technology versionCheck the installed version of Open CASCADE libraries (OCCT). Common locations: the assembly DLL version info, or query via the application's about dialog, or locate opencascade*.dll files and check their version properties. Compare against affected versions: <= 7.9.3 or = 8.0.0Affected if Installed version is 7.9.3 or earlier, or exactly 8.0.0
-
Confirm RWObj module is in useIdentify whether the application or workflow loads and uses the RWObj reader module for parsing OBJ 3D model files. This may be visible in application logs, module dependencies, or by observing that OBJ file import functionality is availableAffected if The RWObj_Reader class is being invoked to parse OBJ files
-
Assess source of OBJ filesDetermine whether the application processes OBJ files from untrusted or external sources. Review file input paths, upload mechanisms, or data pipelines that feed into the OBJ readerAffected if OBJ files from untrusted or external sources are being processed by the vulnerable reader
You are affected if your Open CASCADE version is 7.9.3 or earlier (or exactly 8.0.0) AND you parse OBJ files using RWObj_Reader, especially from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedValidate buffer length is sufficient before accessing aLine + 2; avoid opening untrusted OBJ files until patch is applied.
Open Cascade Technology 8.0.1 or later stable release
- 1. Identify the current Open Cascade Technology version in use by checking the product documentation or assembly metadata
- 2. Download the latest stable release of Open Cascade Technology from the official source (https://www.opencascade.com/)
- 3. Before deploying, test the new version in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with your application
- 4. Replace the existing OCCT libraries with the new version's libraries
- 5. Re-validate all OBJ file parsing functionality to confirm the vulnerability is resolved
- 6. Ensure any automated systems that process OBJ files are restarted to load the updated libraries
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42477 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42477 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data