CVE-2026-42589
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGotenberg is a Docker-powered stateless API for PDF files. Prior to 8.31.0, Gotenberg's /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write HTTP endpoint accepts a JSON metadata object and passes its keys directly to ExifTool via the go-exiftool library. No validation is performed on key characters. A \n embedded in a JSON key splits the ExifTool stdin stream into a new argument line, allowing an attacker to inject arbitrary ExifTool flags — including -if, which evaluates Perl expressions. This achieves unauthenticated OS command execution in a single HTTP request. The response is HTTP 200 with a valid PDF, making the attack transparent to basic monitoring. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.31.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGotenberg versions before 8.31.0 contain an unauthenticated command injection vulnerability in the /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write endpoint. The JSON key values are passed directly to ExifTool without validation, allowing newline characters to inject arbitrary ExifTool flags including -if which can execute Perl expressions for OS command execution. The attack succeeds with a single HTTP request and returns HTTP 200 with a valid PDF, making it undetectable by basic monitoring.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.31.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Gotenberg versionCheck the running Gotenberg container or binary version using 'gotenberg --version' or inspect the container image tag. If using Docker, run 'docker ps' to find the container, then 'docker inspect <container_id>' to view image labels including version.Affected if The installed version is any version before 8.31.0 (e.g., 8.30.0, 8.0.0, 7.x, etc.)
-
Verify ExifTool integration for metadata writesGotenberg uses ExifTool internally for the /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write endpoint. Confirm ExifTool is invoked by reviewing Gotenberg logs when metadata write operations are performed. Check if PDF metadata manipulation feature is in use.Affected if The metadata/write endpoint is actively used or accessible, and Gotenberg passes user-supplied JSON keys directly to ExifTool without sanitization.
-
Assess network exposure of the vulnerable endpointReview reverse proxy, API gateway, or firewall rules to determine if /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write endpoint is exposed to unauthenticated network access. Check for any firewall rules or network policies allowing external traffic to port 3000 (default Gotenberg port) or the exposed HTTP port.Affected if The /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write endpoint is reachable from untrusted networks without authentication or network segmentation.
-
Confirm ExifTool execution capabilityThe vulnerability allows injection of ExifTool flags including -if to execute Perl expressions. If Gotenberg is running with ExifTool installed and the metadata write endpoint is accessible, arbitrary command execution is possible.Affected if ExifTool is installed and executable by the Gotenberg process, enabling the -if flag injection to execute OS commands.
A user is affected if Gotenberg version is below 8.31.0 AND the /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write endpoint is accessible (even locally) with ExifTool available to the Gotenberg process.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.31.0
Upgrade Gotenberg to version 8.31.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability. If immediate upgrade is not possible, disable or restrict access to the /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write endpoint via network segmentation or authentication proxy.
8.31.0
- Stop the currently running Gotenberg container
- Pull the Gotenberg Docker image version 8.31.0: docker pull gotenberg/gotenberg:8.31.0
- Remove the old container: docker rm <container_name>
- Start a new container with the fixed image: docker run -d -p 3000:3000 gotenberg/gotenberg:8.31.0
- Verify the container is running: docker ps
- Test the /forms/pdfengines/metadata/write endpoint to confirm the fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42589 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data