CVE-2026-42599
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSvelte is a performance oriented web framework. Prior to version 5.55.7, when using spread syntax to render attributes from untrusted data, event handler properties are included in the rendered HTML output. If an application spreads user-controlled or external data as element attributes, an attacker can inject malicious event handlers that execute in victims' browsers. Note that this vulnerability only triggers if the user's browser has JavaScript enabled but Svelte's hydration mechanism does not reach the vulnerable element before the event fires. This issue has been patched in version 5.55.7.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Svelte framework versions prior to 5.55.7. When using spread syntax to render attributes from untrusted data, event handler properties can be included in the rendered HTML output, allowing attackers to inject malicious event handlers that execute in victims' browsers. The vulnerability triggers only when JavaScript is enabled but Svelte's hydration mechanism does not reach the vulnerable element before the event fires.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 5.55.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Svelte versionCheck your package.json file for the 'svelte' dependency version, or run 'npm list svelte' or 'yarn list svelte' to see the installed versionAffected if The version listed is less than 5.55.7 (for example, 5.55.6, 5.55.0, 5.0.0, etc.)
-
Find attribute spreading in Svelte templatesSearch your codebase for the spread syntax pattern on HTML elements, such as '<element {...userData}>' or '<Component {...data}>' where data comes from props, API responses, or user inputAffected if Code spreads objects containing untrusted or user-controlled data directly onto elements as attributes
-
Identify sources of untrusted dataReview any spread data that originates from external sources: URL parameters, API responses, user input fields, localStorage, cookies, or data parsed from JSON/untrusted filesAffected if The spread data contains values from untrusted sources without sanitization before being applied to element attributes
-
Check for event handler injection potentialExamine if an attacker could craft malicious data that includes event handler names (like 'onclick', 'onerror', 'onload') within the spread object that gets rendered as attributesAffected if Untrusted data is spread onto elements and could contain attribute names that browsers interpret as event handlers
You are affected if your Svelte version is below 5.55.7 AND your codebase spreads untrusted or user-controlled data directly as element attributes using the spread syntax.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.55.7
Upgrade to Svelte version 5.55.7 or later. Additionally, validate and sanitize all user-controlled or external data before using it with spread syntax on HTML elements.
Svelte 5.55.7
- Upgrade Svelte to version 5.55.7 or later by running npm install [email protected] or yarn add [email protected]
- Verify the upgrade by checking the installed version with npm list svelte or yarn list svelte
- Review your codebase for any instances where untrusted or user-controlled data is spread onto HTML elements using the spread syntax (e.g., <div {...userData}>)
- Ensure that any data being spread onto elements does not contain event handler properties like onClick, onMouseOver, etc., especially if the data originates from external sources or user input
- Test the updated application to confirm the vulnerability is mitigated and the application still functions correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42599 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42599 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data