CVE-2026-42601
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedArchiveBox is an open source self-hosted web archiving system. In versions 0.8.6rc0 and prior, the /add/ endpoint (AddView in core/views.py) accepts a config JSON field that gets merged into the crawl config without validation. This config is exported as environment variables when archive plugins run, allowing injection of arbitrary tool arguments to achieve RCE. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe /add/ endpoint in ArchiveBox versions 0.8.6rc0 and prior accepts a config JSON field that gets merged into the crawl configuration without any validation. This unsanitized config is then exported as environment variables when archive plugins execute, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary tool arguments and achieve remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.8.6= 0.8.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check ArchiveBox versionRun 'archivebox --version' or check the version file in your installation directoryAffected if Version is 0.8.6 or any version prior to 0.8.6 (including 0.8.6rc0)
-
Verify /add/ endpoint is network-accessibleCheck firewall rules, reverse proxy configuration, or network ACLs to determine if the /add/ HTTP endpoint is exposed to untrusted networksAffected if The /add/ endpoint is reachable from the internet or untrusted networks without authentication
-
Confirm archive plugins are enabledInspect the ArchiveBox configuration (config.yaml, config.json, or environment variables) for enabled archive plugins (e.g., screenshot, singlefile, mercury, readability)Affected if Archive plugins are enabled and configured to execute during crawl operations
-
Test for unauthenticated config injectionSend a POST request to /add/ with a config JSON field containing a test parameter (e.g., {'test': 'value'}) and verify it is accepted without validationAffected if The /add/ endpoint accepts and processes arbitrary JSON in the config field without sanitization or validation
You are affected if running ArchiveBox version 0.8.6 or earlier AND the /add/ endpoint is exposed to untrusted access AND archive plugins are enabled, as this combination allows unauthenticated config injection leading to RCE.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.8.6
Implement strict validation and allowlisting for the config JSON field in the /add/ endpoint before it is merged into the crawl config. Until a patch is available, consider network segmentation or disabling the /add/ endpoint from untrusted networks.
Latest version > 0.8.6 (check GitHub for exact release)
- 1. Back up your ArchiveBox data and configuration before upgrading
- 2. Check the official ArchiveBox GitHub repository (github.com) for the latest release version that addresses this vulnerability
- 3. Upgrade ArchiveBox to the latest available version (ideally a version higher than 0.8.6)
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
- 5. Test the /add/ endpoint to ensure it no longer allows arbitrary config injection
- 6. Review the configuration to ensure no malicious entries were added during the vulnerability window
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42601 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42601 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data