Uncontrolled Resource ConsumptionWeakness · CWE-400

CVE-2026-42626

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
64/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
HP ENVY 5000 series printers VERBASPP1N003.2237A.00 do not properly manage concurrent TCP connections to port 9100 (JetDirect/RAW printing). An unauthenticated remote attacker on the same network can establish a persistent connection to port 9100 and send keep-alive packets, causing the printer's session threads to remain locked in a waiting state. The firmware lacks connection timeouts and concurrent session limits, resulting in a persistent Denial of Service (DoS) that renders the printer unresponsive to all user commands and print jobs. Physical intervention (manual restart) is required to restore functionality, and the attack can be immediately re-initiated.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

HP ENVY 5000 series printers with firmware VERBASPP1N003.2237A.00 lack proper TCP connection management for port 9100 (JetDirect/RAW printing). An unauthenticated attacker on the local network can establish persistent connections with keep-alive packets that lock session threads in waiting state indefinitely. The firmware includes no connection timeouts or concurrent session limits, causing a permanent DoS that requires manual printer restart.

MitigationContact HP for available firmware updates addressing this vulnerability. Implement network segmentation and access controls to restrict port 9100 access to trusted hosts only, as a compensating control until vendor firmware patch is available.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the printer model
    Access the printer's web interface or print a configuration page to confirm the model is HP ENVY 5000 series
    Affected if The printer model is not an HP ENVY 5000 series device, then this CVE does not apply
  2. Check the firmware version
    Print a configuration page or access the printer's embedded web server to view the firmware version
    Affected if The firmware version matches VERBASPP1N003.2237A.00; if the version is different or unknown, compare to the affected version and check vendor release notes for updates
  3. Verify port 9100 accessibility
    Use a network scanner or run 'telnet <printer-ip> 9100' or 'nc -zv <printer-ip> 9100' from a client on the same network to confirm the JetDirect port is open and reachable
    Affected if Port 9100 is open and responds to connection attempts, indicating the vulnerable service is exposed
  4. Assess network exposure
    Review network configuration to determine if the printer is accessible from untrusted network segments or the internet; check firewall rules and VLAN placement
    Affected if Port 9100 is reachable from untrusted network segments, guest networks, or the internet without proper access controls

A user is affected if they have an HP ENVY 5000 series printer running firmware VERBASPP1N003.2237A.00 with port 9100 exposed to untrusted or untrusted network segments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Contact HP for available firmware updates addressing this vulnerability. Implement network segmentation and access controls to restrict port 9100 access to trusted hosts only, as a compensating control until vendor firmware patch is available.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42626 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42626 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data