CVE-2026-42773
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in eMagicOne eMagicOne Store Manager allows Blind SQL Injection. This issue affects eMagicOne Store Manager: from n/a through 1.3.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability in eMagicOne Store Manager allows attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input fields. The vulnerability is classified as blind SQL injection, meaning attackers infer information from application behavior differences rather than direct error output. With a CVSS score of 9.3, this critical flaw could allow complete database compromise, including unauthorized data exfiltration, modification, or deletion.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm eMagicOne Store Manager is installedLocate the Store Manager application in your system by checking the program directory, installation folder, or running processes. Typical installation paths may include C:\Program Files\eMagicOne\Store Manager or similar. Check the application name/version from the executable or installation metadata.Affected if The application eMagicOne Store Manager is present on the system
-
Determine the installed versionRight-click on the Store Manager executable, select Properties, and view the Version tab. Alternatively, open the application and navigate to Help > About or Settings > Version to view the exact build number. Compare the version to 1.3.2.Affected if The installed version is 1.3.2 or any version prior to 1.3.2
-
Identify user input fields in SQL-connected featuresReview the Store Manager interface for fields that accept user input and interact with the database, such as product search, customer lookup, order filtering, or custom report parameters. These are the potential injection points.Affected if User input fields exist in the application that interface with database queries
-
Verify if parameterization is implementedInspect the application configuration or database connection settings. Check whether the application uses parameterized queries or prepared statements for database interactions, or review any accessible logs for SQL syntax errors that may indicate unsanitized input processing.Affected if The application does not use parameterized queries and accepts direct user input into SQL commands
You are affected if eMagicOne Store Manager version 1.3.2 or earlier is installed and the application processes user-supplied input through unsanitized SQL queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version provided by eMagicOne. If no patch is available, implement strict input validation and convert all dynamic SQL queries to parameterized queries (prepared statements) to eliminate injection vectors.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42773 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42773 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data