CVE-2026-42828
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer over-read in Windows Projected File System Filter Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer over-read vulnerability exists in the Windows Projected File System Filter Driver (projfs.sys), a kernel-mode component. The flaw allows a locally authorized attacker to read beyond buffer boundaries and escalate privileges to higher integrity levels, potentially achieving SYSTEM privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.17763.8880< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.17763.8880CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version against affected rangesRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the installed Windows build number. Compare the build (e.g., 17763, 19044, 19045, 22631, 26100, 26200, 28000) to the affected version thresholds: 17763.8880, 19044.7417, 19045.7417, 22631.7219, 26100.8655, 26200.8655, 28000.2269.Affected if The installed build number is lower than the corresponding threshold for your Windows version.
-
Verify if Projected File System (ProjFS) feature is enabledCheck the Windows optional features list by running 'dism /Online /Get-Features' or checking the registry key 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup\State' for ImageState VALUE "IMAGE_STATE_COMPLETE", then 'Get-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online' in PowerShell to see if 'ClientForProjectedFS' or 'ProjectedFS' is enabled.Affected if The ProjFS feature (ClientForProjectedFS or ProjectedFS) is enabled on the system.
-
Check ProjFS filter driver versionLocate the ProjFS driver file (projfs.sys typically in C:\Windows\System32\drivers\) and right-click properties to view File Version, or run 'dir C:\Windows\System32\drivers\projfs.sys' to see the file. Alternatively, use 'driverquery /v | findstr projfs' if the driver is loaded.Affected if The driver file exists and its version is not yet patched to the fixed build versions listed in the affected products.
-
Confirm driver is loaded in memoryRun 'sc query projfs' or 'sc query type= driver' and filter for ProjFS-related entries, or use 'fltmc filters' to list loaded file system mini-filters and look for entries containing 'ProjFS' or 'ProjectedFS'.Affected if The ProjFS mini-filter driver is actively loaded in kernel memory.
A system is affected if it runs a Windows version with a build number below the specified thresholds AND has the Projected File System (ProjFS) feature or driver enabled/loaded.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.17763.888010.0.19044.741710.0.19045.7417
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for this CVE through Windows Update or enterprise patch management systems. Verify the patched driver version matches the vendor-recommended version.
Windows 10 1809: Build 10.0.17763.8880 | Windows 10 21h2: Build 10.0.19044.7417 | Windows 10 22h2: Build 10.0.19045.7417 | Windows 11 23h2: Build 10.0.22631.7219 | Windows 11 24h2: Build 10.0.26100.8655 | Windows 11 25h2: Build 10.0.26200.8655 | Windows 11 26h1: Build 10.0.28000.2269 | Windows Serve
- Open Windows Settings and navigate to Windows Update
- Check for updates and install all available security updates
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the installation
- Verify the installed build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows edition
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42828 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data