Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-42840

MEDIUM · 5.1 CVSS v4.0 Published 2026-06-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
55/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An authenticated user can persist arbitrary HTML/JavaScript in the email_id or mobile_no fields of a Customer record and trigger unescaped rendering in the Point of Sale (POS) interface for every operator who selects that customer. This issue affects ERPNext: 16.16.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ERPNext's Point of Sale interface. An authenticated user can inject malicious HTML/JavaScript into the email_id or mobile_no fields of a Customer record, which then executes in the browsers of all POS operators who select that customer, due to unescaped rendering of these fields.

MitigationImplement proper output encoding/escaping for the email_id and mobile_no fields when rendered in the POS interface, and add input validation to reject HTML/JavaScript in these fields at the point of entry.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
P
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ERPNext installation and version
    Access the ERPNext system via the command line (bench version) or check the About section in the Frappe/ERPNext UI. Compare the installed version to any official ERPNext release notes.
    Affected if The installed ERPNext version falls within the vulnerable version range (if known) or is an unpatched version.
  2. Verify POS module is enabled
    Log in as Administrator, navigate to the Modules section, or use the bench command: bench get-app erpnext and check module list. Verify if Point of Sale (POS) is listed as an active module.
    Affected if The POS module is installed and accessible to users, making the XSS payload executable path available.
  3. Check for Customer records with injected payloads
    Access the Customer list doctype (via: /app/customer or bench --site [sitename] execute frappe.call --method=frappe.boot.get_allow_docs) and review the email_id and mobile_no fields for any suspicious patterns (e.g., <script>, javascript:, onerror=, img src=x onerror=). Use a database query if direct access is available: SELECT name, email_id, mobile_no FROM tabCustomer WHERE email_id LIKE '%<%' OR mobile_no LIKE '%<%';
    Affected if Customer records exist where email_id or mobile_no fields contain unescaped HTML/JavaScript characters (<, >, script tags, event handlers).
  4. Inspect user roles with Customer write access
    Go to Role and Role Profile management (via /app/role or /app/role-profile) and identify which roles have Create, Write, or Edit permissions on the Customer doctype. Check User records to see which authenticated users hold these roles.
    Affected if Authenticated users with Customer creation/editing permissions exist in the system, allowing them to inject the malicious payload.

Your environment is affected if ERPNext is running, the POS module is active, and Customer records exist with unsanitized input in email_id or mobile_no fields that could be rendered when POS operators view those customers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper output encoding/escaping for the email_id and mobile_no fields when rendered in the POS interface, and add input validation to reject HTML/JavaScript in these fields at the point of entry.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42840 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42840 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data