CVE-2026-42871
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWeGIA is a web manager for charitable institutions. In versions prior to 3.7.0, atendido/familiar_docfamiliar.php displays an overly descriptive error message, including database-related details. This verbosity leads to information disclosure, which could assist a potential attacker in mapping the backend infrastructure and expanding the attack surface. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceWeGIA versions prior to 3.7.0 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the file atendido/familiar_docfamiliar.php. The script returns overly descriptive error messages that expose database-related details such as table names, query structure, or connection information. This information can help attackers map the backend infrastructure and identify further attack vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate WeGIA installation directorySearch for the file 'atendido/familiar_docfamiliar.php' or 'atendimento/familiar_docfamiliar.php' in your web server document root or common application directories. Common paths may include /var/www/, /opt/, or C:\inetpub\wwwroot\ on Windows servers.Affected if The file exists in your environment, indicating WeGIA is installed and the vulnerable script is present.
-
Determine installed WeGIA versionLook for a version file, CHANGELOG, or configuration file in the WeGIA root directory. Common version indicators include a 'version' file, 'VERSION' constant in PHP files, or entries in a config file. Check files like 'index.php', 'config.php', or a 'VERSION' file in the application root.Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.7.0, or if no version can be determined and the vulnerable file is present.
-
Verify the vulnerable script existsConfirm the file 'atendido/familiar_docfamiliar.php' (or 'atendimento/familiar_docfamiliar.php') exists in your WeGIA installation. Access the file via a web browser or check the filesystem directly.Affected if The file exists in your installation and the version is prior to 3.7.0.
-
Check PHP error display configurationReview your PHP configuration (php.ini) or check for runtime error reporting settings in the application. Look for 'display_errors = On' or 'error_reporting' set to high verbosity (such as E_ALL). You can also create a simple PHP info page to check this.Affected if PHP display_errors is enabled (set to On or 1), which would allow the overly descriptive error messages to be rendered in the browser.
You are affected if WeGIA version is lower than 3.7.0 AND the file atendimento/familiar_docfamiliar.php exists AND PHP error display is enabled, allowing database details to be exposed in error messages.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade WeGIA to version 3.7.0 or later to obtain the fix for this vulnerability. As a temporary measure, ensure custom error handlers are configured to suppress detailed database errors in production environments.
3.7.0
- Backup the current WeGIA installation and database before upgrading
- Obtain WeGIA version 3.7.0 from the official source (github.com or vendor repository)
- Replace the existing WeGIA files with the version 3.7.0 files, ensuring theberto/familiar_docfamiliar.php is updated to the fixed version
- Verify the fix by testing atendidos/familiar_docfamiliar.php to confirm error messages no longer expose database details
- Confirm the application functions normally after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42871 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42871 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data