CVE-2026-42906
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedExposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Windows Shell allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local information disclosure vulnerability in Windows Shell where an authorized local attacker can gain access to sensitive information they should not have access to. The vulnerability stems from improper handling of sensitive data within the Windows Shell component, potentially exposing file contents, user data, or system configuration details to a local user with standard privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.20348.5256< 10.0.26100.32995CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionOpen Command Prompt and run `winver` or `systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"` to obtain the exact build numberAffected if The displayed build number is lower than any of the following thresholds: Windows 10 21h2: 19044.7417, Windows 10 22h2: 19045.7417, Windows 11 23h2: 22631.7219, Windows 11 24h2: 26100.8655, Windows 11 25h2: 26200.8655, Windows 11 26h1: 28000.2269, Windows Server 2022: 20348.5256, Windows Server 2025
-
Identify Windows edition and releaseRun `winver` or check System Properties to determine if the system is Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2, Windows 11 26h1, Server 2022, or Server 2025Affected if The system matches any of the affected product versions listed in the CVE and the build number is below the corresponding threshold
-
Confirm Windows Shell component is presentVerify the Windows Shell is running by checking that explorer.exe process is active in Task Manager or running `Get-Process | Where-Object {$_.ProcessName -eq "explorer"}` in PowerShellAffected if The Windows Shell (explorer.exe) is present and running, which is the default state for affected Windows installations
The system is affected if it runs any of the listed Windows 10 or Windows 11 versions, or Windows Server 2022/2025, with a build number lower than the specified threshold for that version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.19044.741710.0.19045.741710.0.20348.5256
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for Windows Shell when released, or ensure systems are kept current with Windows Update. Verify that user permissions are appropriately restricted following the principle of least privilege.
Windows 10 21h2: build 10.0.19044.7417 or later | Windows 10 22h2: build 10.0.19045.7417 or later | Windows 11 23h2: build 10.0.22631.7219 or later | Windows 11 24h2: build 10.0.26100.8655 or later | Windows 11 25h2: build 10.0.26200.8655 or later | Windows 11 26h1: build 10.0.28000.2269 or later |
- 1. Identify the current Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' in Command Prompt
- 2. Determine which Windows release branch your system is on (e.g., 21h2, 22h2, 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, 26h1, Server 2022, or Server 2025)
- 3. Check if your current build number is less than the fixed version for your release branch
- 4. If vulnerable, apply Windows Updates: Open Settings > Windows Update > Check for updates
- 5. Alternatively, manually download and install the specific security update from the Microsoft Update Catalog matching your Windows version (e.g., KB5063119 for the relevant month)
- 6. Restart the system after updates are installed
- 7. Verify the fix by checking that the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your release branch
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42906 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42906 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data