CVE-2026-42912
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Telephony Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in Windows Telephony Service where concurrent access to shared resources lacks proper synchronization. An authorized attacker with local access can exploit this timing vulnerability to elevate their privileges from a standard user to higher-level system permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9234< 10.0.17763.8880< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows versionRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to identify your Windows version and build numberAffected if The build number is lower than any of these: 14393.9234 (Win10 1607), 17763.8880 (Win10 1809), 19044.7417 (Win10 21h2), 19045.7417 (Win10 22h2), 22631.7219 (Win11 23h2), 26100.8655 (Win11 24h2), 26200.8655 (Win11 25h2), 28000.2269 (Win11 26h1)
-
Verify Telephony Service presenceRun 'Get-Service TphSvc' or 'sc query TphSvc' to check if the Windows Telephony Service is present on the systemAffected if The service exists and is running - the vulnerability requires this service to be available for privilege escalation
-
Check for installed security updatesRun 'Get-HotFix | Where-Object {$_.Description -eq "Security Update"} | Sort-Object InstalledOn -Descending | Select-Object -First 10' to list recently installed security updates, or check Windows Update history for the specific CVE patchAffected if The relevant security update for CVE-2026-42912 is NOT installed - no corresponding KB article or security patch found in the update history
You are affected if your Windows build number falls below the affected thresholds AND the Telephony Service is present on your system AND the corresponding security update is not installed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.923410.0.17763.888010.0.19044.7417
Apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-42912 to all affected Windows systems. Prioritize endpoints where users have local access or where Telephony Service is running.
Install the latest Windows security updates from Windows Update that address CVE-2026-42912
- Open Windows Settings and navigate to Windows Update
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest security updates
- Ensure the update includes the patch for CVE-2026-42912 (Windows Telephony Service privilege escalation)
- Restart the system after updates are installed
- Verify the installed Windows version matches or exceeds the fixed build number for your release: Windows 10 1607: 10.0.14393.9234, Windows 10 1809: 10.0.17763.8880, Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7417, Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7417, Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.7219, Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8655, Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8655, Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.2269
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42912 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42912 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data