CVE-2026-42914
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOut-of-bounds read in Windows Kerberos allows an authorized attacker to deny service over a network.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in Windows Kerberos authentication service. An attacker with valid credentials can trigger the vulnerability by sending specially crafted network requests to a Windows system running Kerberos, causing the service to read beyond allocated memory bounds and potentially crash, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9234< 10.0.17763.8880< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Windows version and build numberOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run: winver or systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version" or [System.Environment]::OSVersion.Version.ToString()Affected if The displayed build number is lower than any of these thresholds: 14393.9234 (Win10 1607), 17763.8880 (Win10 1809), 19044.7417 (Win10 21h2), 19045.7417 (Win10 22h2), 22631.7219 (Win11 23h2), 26100.8655 (Win11 24h2), 26200.8655 (Win11 25h2), or 28000.2269 (Win11 26h1)
-
Confirm Kerberos is in useCheck if the system is domain-joined: run dsregcmd /status in Command Prompt; look for AzureAdJoined or DomainJoined status, or check registry key HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Kerberos\Parameters for a valid DefaultDomain valueAffected if The system is domain-joined or has Kerberos authentication configured (Kerberos is enabled by default on all domain-joined Windows systems)
-
Assess network exposure of Kerberos servicesRun netstat -an | findstr ":88" to check if Kerberos ports (88/TCP and 88/UDP) are listening, indicating the system is acting as a Kerberos server or is reachable on these portsAffected if Port 88 is listening and accessible from network locations outside the trusted authentication server pool
The system is affected if its Windows build number falls below the fixed version thresholds AND Kerberos is enabled AND the system has network accessibility on Kerberos ports.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.923410.0.17763.888010.0.19044.7417
Apply Microsoft security updates for CVE-2026-42914 to all affected Windows systems, prioritizing domain controllers and servers running Kerberos authentication services; verify Kerberos authentication functionality after patching.
For Windows 10 1607: upgrade to 10.0.14393.9234 or later | Windows 10 1809: upgrade to 10.0.17763.8880 or later | Windows 10 21h2: upgrade to 10.0.19044.7417 or later | Windows 10 22h2: upgrade to 10.0.19045.7417 or later | Windows 11 23h2: upgrade to 10.0.22631.7219 or later | Windows 11 24h2: upgr
- Open Windows Settings on the affected system
- Navigate to Windows Update or use WSUS/Intune to check for available updates
- Install the cumulative update that includes the fix for CVE-2026-42914
- Restart the system as required to complete the installation
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42914 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42914 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data