CVE-2026-42915
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect calculation of buffer size in Windows VMSwitch allows an authorized attacker to deny service locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIncorrect buffer size calculation in Windows VMSwitch (the virtual switch component for Hyper-V) allows a locally positioned authorized attacker to cause a denial of service via the buffer sizing flaw.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.20348.5256< 10.0.26100.32995CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version against affected rangesRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' and compare the build number to the vulnerable versions: 19044.7417 (Win10 21h2), 19045.7417 (Win10 22h2), 22631.7219 (Win11 23h2), 26100.8655 (Win11 24h2/Server2025), 26200.8655 (Win11 25h2), 28000.2269 (Win11 26h1), 20348.5256 (Server2022)Affected if The installed build number is LOWER than the threshold for your Windows version
-
Verify Hyper-V is installedRun 'Get-WindowsOptionalFeature -Online -FeatureName Microsoft-Hyper-V' in PowerShell, or check 'systeminfo' for Hyper-V requirementsAffected if Hyper-V is installed and the Windows version check shows a vulnerable build
-
Confirm VMSwitch is presentRun 'Get-VMSwitch -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue' in PowerShell (requires Hyper-V PowerShell module)Affected if VMSwitch exists and the system is on a vulnerable Windows version
-
Check Hyper-V Virtual Switch extension statusRun 'Get-VMSwitchExtension -VMSwitchName (Get-VMSwitch).Name' to list extensions including VMSwitchAffected if VMSwitch extension is loaded and the host OS is vulnerable
You are affected if your Windows build is below the threshold for your version AND Hyper-V with VMSwitch is enabled on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.19044.741710.0.19045.741710.0.20348.5256
Apply the Microsoft security update for this vulnerability through Windows Update or enterprise patch management once released. Prioritize patching Windows Server systems running the Hyper-V role.
Windows 10 21h2: 10.0.19044.7417 or later | Windows 10 22h2: 10.0.19045.7417 or later | Windows 11 23h2: 10.0.22631.7219 or later | Windows 11 24h2: 10.0.26100.8655 or later | Windows 11 25h2: 10.0.26200.8655 or later | Windows 11 26h1: 10.0.28000.2269 or later | Windows Server 2022: 10.0.20348.5256
- Identify the current Windows version by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo' to confirm which build number is installed
- Determine the applicable upgrade path from the affected versions list based on your current Windows edition (Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2, Windows 11 23h2/24h2/25h2/26h1, Windows Server 2022, or Windows Server 2025)
- Apply the latest Windows Security Update that addresses this vulnerability by checking Windows Update or Microsoft's Update Catalog
- Verify the installation was successful by running 'winver' and confirming the build number matches or exceeds the fixed version (e.g., 10.0.19044.7417 for Windows 10 21h2)
- Restart the system if prompted to complete the update installation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42915 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42915 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data