CVE-2026-42919
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability exists in BIG-IP systems that may allow an authenticated attacker with administrative access to escalate their privileges. A successful exploit may allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCVE-2026-42919 is a privilege escalation vulnerability in F5 BIG-IP systems that allows an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges to escalate their privileges beyond their assigned role. Successful exploitation may allow the attacker to cross security boundaries, potentially gaining unauthorized access to sensitive resources or functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1= 21.0.0>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or 'bigpipe version' from the command line to obtain the running software versionAffected if The version falls within 17.1.0-17.1.3, 17.5.0-17.5.1, 21.0.0, or 16.1.0-16.1.6
-
Confirm installed modulesRun 'tmsh list sys provision' to list all provisioned BIG-IP modulesAffected if Any of the following modules are provisioned: APM, AFM, ASM, Analytics, AAM, AVR, or Automation Toolchain, and the version is affected
-
Review user role assignmentsRun 'tmsh list auth user' to view all administrative users and their assigned rolesAffected if Users with administrative roles other than full admin exist, as the vulnerability allows escalation beyond assigned roles
-
Examine audit logs for privilege changesReview logs at /var/log/audit for entries containing 'role', 'privilege', or 'user modification' particularly those made by users with non-full-admin rolesAffected if Unexpected role modifications or privilege escalation attempts are logged for users who should not have full administrative access
-
Check for suspicious admin sessionsRun 'tmsh show auth user' to view active administrative sessions and compare against expected administrative personnelAffected if Administrative sessions exist from accounts that should not have elevated privileges based on their assigned role
You are affected if your BIG-IP version matches the affected ranges AND you have multiple administrative user roles configured beyond a single full administrator account.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply F5's official patches when available. Until then, strictly limit administrative access to trusted personnel only, enforce least-privilege administrative roles, and monitor for suspicious privilege escalation activity in audit logs.
Upgrade to the fixed maintenance release as specified in the F5 security advisory for your version branch (versions beyond 17.1.3, 17.5.1, 16.1.6, and 21.0.0)
- 1. Navigate to the F5 BIG-IP support portal at my.f5.com and locate the security advisory for CVE-2026-42919
- 2. Identify the specific fixed version for your current BIG-IP version branch (16.1.x, 17.1.x, 17.5.x, or 21.0.0) from the advisory
- 3. Download the recommended hotfix or maintenance release from F5 Downloads
- 4. Review the F5 release notes for any known issues or prerequisites before upgrading
- 5. Plan a maintenance window and ensure you have a complete backup of the BIG-IP configuration
- 6. Upload the ISO/image to the BIG-IP and install the update via the web interface (System > Software Management > Image List > Upload) or via TMSH: 'install volume <volume_name> recursive <image_name>'
- 7. After installation, reboot the BIG-IP to boot from the new volume
- 8. Verify the BIG-IP services are operational and confirm the version matches the expected fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42919 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42919 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data