CVE-2026-42937
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect permission assignment vulnerabilities exist in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ TMOS Shell (tmsh) arp and ndp commands, and in BIG-IP iControl REST. These vulnerabilities may allow an authenticated attacker to view adjacent network information. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIncorrect permission assignment in BIG-IP and BIG-IQ TMOS Shell (tmsh) arp and ndp commands, and in BIG-IP iControl REST, allows authenticated attackers to view adjacent network information (ARP/NDP tables) that should be restricted.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4>= 16.1.0, <= 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, <= 17.1.3.1>= 17.5.0, <= 17.5.1.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed BIG-IP versionRun `tmsh show sys version` or check `/VERSION` file on the systemAffected if The version falls within 16.1.0-16.1.6, 17.1.0-17.1.3.1, or 17.5.0-17.5.1.4
-
Verify authenticated user access to tmsh arp commandAs a non-administrator user with tmsh access, run `tmsh show net arp` and check if it returns ARP table entriesAffected if The command returns ARP table data for a user who should not have permission to view it
-
Verify authenticated user access to tmsh ndp commandAs a non-administrator user with tmsh access, run `tmsh show net ndp` and check if it returns NDP table entriesAffected if The command returns NDP table data for a user who should not have permission to view it
-
Check iControl REST access to network adjacency dataUsing an authenticated but low-privilege iControl REST user session, query `/mgmt/tm/net/arp/` endpoint and verify if ARP data is returnedAffected if The API returns ARP table information to a user lacking network administrative privileges
A system is affected if it runs a version within 16.1.0-16.1.6, 17.1.0-17.1.3.1, or 17.5.0-17.5.1.4 AND any authenticated user with restricted privileges can retrieve ARP or NDP table data via tmsh or iControl REST.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply F5 security updates for BIG-IP and BIG-IQ to fix permission assignments in tmsh commands and iControl REST; review user role permissions to ensure least-privilege access to network adjacency information.
Upgrade to BIG-IP 16.1.7+ or 17.1.4+ or 17.5.2+ (choose the appropriate release branch)
- 1. Identify the exact BIG-IP or BIG-IQ version currently installed using 'tmsh show sys version' or via the web UI under System > Software > Image List
- 2. Confirm the module(s) affected in your deployment (APM, AFM, ASM, Analytics, AAM, AVR, or Automation Toolchain)
- 3. Review F5 KB article at https://my.f5.com for the specific advisory K0000xxx related to CVE-2026-42937 for version details
- 4. Download the fixed version (16.1.7 or later within 16.1.x, 17.1.4 or later within 17.1.x, or 17.5.2 or later within 17.5.x) from F5 downloads
- 5. Plan maintenance window following F5 upgrade best practices - backup configuration with 'tmsh save sys config'
- 6. Upload the ISO/image to the BIG-IP device via GUI (System > Software > Image Upload) or API
- 7. Install the new version and reboot using F5 rolling upgrade procedure to maintain service continuity
- 8. Verify the fix by confirming the updated version and testing that arp/ndp command permissions are properly restricted
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42937 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42937 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data