CVE-2026-42971
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedExposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Windows Push Notifications allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a local information disclosure vulnerability in the Windows Push Notifications component. An authorized attacker with local access to the system can exploit this to disclose sensitive information. The vulnerability stems from improper access controls within the Windows Push Notifications system that allow a low-privileged user to access data they should not have permission to view.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.14393.9234< 10.0.17763.8880< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows version and build numberOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run: winver or systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version" or [System.Environment]::OSVersion.VersionAffected if The displayed version matches any of the affected builds: Windows 10 1607 (<10.0.14393.9234), 1809 (<10.0.17763.8880), 21h2 (<10.0.19044.7417), 22h2 (<10.0.19045.7417), or Windows 11 23h2 (<10.0.22631.7219), 24h2 (<10.0.26100.8655), 25h2 (<10.0.26200.8655), 26h1 (<10.0.28000.2269)
-
Verify Windows Push Notifications service statusOpen Services console (services.msc) and locate 'Windows Push Notifications User Service_XXXXX' or run: Get-Service | Where-Object {$_.Name -like '*Push*'}Affected if The Windows Push Notifications service is running or enabled on the system
-
Confirm notification settings configurationGo to Settings > System > Notifications, or run: Get-ItemProperty -Path 'HKCU:\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Notifications\Settings' -ErrorAction SilentlyContinueAffected if Windows Push Notifications are enabled (the vulnerability applies when notifications are configured)
A system is affected if it runs any Windows 10 or 11 version within the listed affected build ranges AND has Windows Push Notifications feature available or enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.14393.923410.0.17763.888010.0.19044.7417
Apply the relevant Microsoft security update for Windows Push Notifications. Ensure systems are patched with the latest cumulative updates and verify that users operate with the principle of least privilege to limit potential exposure.
Windows 10 1607: >= 10.0.14393.9234 | Windows 10 1809: >= 10.0.17763.8880 | Windows 10 21h2: >= 10.0.19044.7417 | Windows 10 22h2: >= 10.0.19045.7417 | Windows 11 23h2: >= 10.0.22631.7219 | Windows 11 24h2: >= 10.0.26100.8655 | Windows 11 25h2: >= 10.0.26200.8655 | Windows 11 26h1: >= 10.0.28000.226
- Open Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update on the affected Windows machine
- Click 'Check for updates' to download and install the latest cumulative security update
- Restart the system when prompted to complete the installation
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release (e.g., Windows 10 22h2 should be >= 10.0.19045.7417)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42971 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42971 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data