CVE-2026-42979
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Push Notifications allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in Windows Push Notifications where concurrent execution leads to improper synchronization, allowing a locally authorized attacker to elevate privileges. The flaw allows manipulation of shared resources during notification processing to gain higher system access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.17763.8880< 10.0.19044.7417< 10.0.19045.7417< 10.0.22631.7219< 10.0.26100.8655< 10.0.26200.8655< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.17763.8880CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Windows version and build numberRun 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the exact Windows version and build numberAffected if The installed build number is lower than the affected threshold for your Windows release (17763.8880, 19044.7417, 19045.7417, 22631.7219, 26100.8655, 26200.8655, 28000.2269)
-
Confirm Windows Push Notifications component is presentCheck for the presence of the Windows Push Notification service by running 'Get-Service -Name WpnUserService' in PowerShell or checking registry key 'HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\WpnUserService'Affected if The Windows Push Notification User Service (WpnUserService) exists on the system
-
Verify local attacker execution contextThe vulnerability requires a locally authenticated attacker to manipulate shared resources; assess whether untrusted local users have the ability to execute code on the systemAffected if Multiple users have local account access or the system permits execution by non-privileged accounts
If your Windows build is below the affected threshold and the Push Notifications service is present, your environment may be vulnerable to this privilege escalation flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.17763.888010.0.19044.741710.0.19045.7417
Apply Microsoft security updates for Windows Push Notifications when available. Restrict local user privileges and monitor for unusual notification service behavior. Consider disabling push notifications if not required in high-security environments.
Apply Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-42979 from Windows Update or Microsoft Update Catalog (specific KB number available on MSRC)
- Check current Windows version and build number by running 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"'
- Open Windows Update by typing 'ms-settings:windowsupdate' in Windows Run dialog
- Click 'Check for updates' and install all available security updates
- After updates install, restart the system when prompted
- Verify the installed build number matches or exceeds the fixed version for your Windows release (Windows 10 1809/Server 2019: 10.0.17763.8880, 21H2: 10.0.19044.7417, 22H2: 10.0.19045.7417, 11 23H2: 10.0.22631.7219, 11 24H2: 10.0.26100.8655, 11 25H2: 10.0.26200.8655, 11 26H1: 10.0.28000.2269)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-42979 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-42979 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data