CVE-2026-43513
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in LockOutRealm in Apache Tomcat. This issue affects Apache Tomcat: from 11.0.0-M1 through 11.0.21, from 10.1.0-M1 through 10.1.54, from 9.0.0.M1 through 9.0.117, from 8.5.0 through 8.5.100, from 7.0.0 through 7.0.109. Older unsupported versions may also be affected. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 11.0.22, 10.1.55 or 9.0.118 which fix the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe LockOutRealm component in Apache Tomcat, which provides account lockout functionality to prevent brute-force attacks, improperly handles case sensitivity when checking usernames. This could allow an attacker to bypass lockout protections by using different letter casing (e.g., 'Admin' vs 'admin') to continue brute-force attempts after an account is locked.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.109>= 8.5.0, <= 8.5.100>= 9.0.0, < 9.0.118>= 10.1.0, < 10.1.55>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.22CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Tomcat installation versionLocate the catalina.jar file in the Tomcat lib directory and read its META-INF/MANIFEST.MF file, or execute the version.sh script in the Tomcat bin directory. Look for the Specification-Version or Tomcat version number.Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 7.0.0 to 7.0.109, 8.5.0 to 8.5.100, 9.0.0 to 9.0.117, 10.1.0 to 10.1.54, or 11.0.0 to 11.0.21
-
Confirm LockOutRealm is in useExamine the conf/server.xml and conf/context.xml files for a <Realm> element. Look for a className attribute containing 'LockOutRealm', for example: <Realm className='org.apache.catalina.realm.LockOutRealm' .../>Affected if LockOutRealm is configured as the authentication realm in server.xml or context.xml
-
Check for nested Realms beneath LockOutRealmWithin the same Realm element in server.xml or context.xml, inspect child elements that define the underlying user database such as <UserDatabase>, <DataSourceRealm>, <JDBCRealm>, or <MemoryRealm>. Note the username storage format used.Affected if LockOutRealm wraps another Realm and usernames are stored in a case-sensitive format, making the bypass possible
You are affected if your Tomcat version is within the affected ranges AND LockOutRealm is configured as your authentication realm, allowing case-variant username attempts to bypass lockout protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped9.0.11810.1.5511.0.22
Upgrade Apache Tomcat to version 11.0.22, 10.1.55, or 9.0.118 (depending on the major version line in use) to obtain the fix for the case sensitivity handling flaw in LockOutRealm.
Tomcat 9.0.118 (or 10.1.55/11.0.22 depending on your major version line)
- Identify your current Apache Tomcat version by checking the $CATALINA_HOME/lib/catalina.jar or server info
- For Tomcat 7.x (7.0.0-7.0.109): This version line is end-of-life with no direct fix; migrate to Tomcat 9.x or 10.x/11.x
- For Tomcat 8.5.x (8.5.0-8.5.100): Upgrade to Tomcat 9.0.118 or later, or Tomcat 10.1.x/11.x
- For Tomcat 9.0.x (9.0.0-9.0.117): Upgrade to version 9.0.118
- For Tomcat 10.1.x (10.1.0-10.1.54): Upgrade to version 10.1.55
- Download the new version from https://tomcat.apache.org/
- Stop the Tomcat service or instance
- Backup your existing Tomcat installation including conf/ directory
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43513 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43513 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data