CVE-2026-43619
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRsync version 3.4.2 and prior contain symlink race condition vulnerabilities in path-based system calls including chmod, lchown, utimes, rename, unlink, mkdir, symlink, mknod, link, rmdir, and lstat that allow local attackers to redirect operations to files outside the exported rsync module. Attackers with local filesystem access can exploit the timing window between path resolution and syscall execution by swapping symlinks to apply sender-supplied permissions, ownership, timestamps, or filenames to arbitrary files outside the intended module boundary on rsync daemons configured with 'use chroot = no'.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRsync versions 3.4.2 and prior suffer from TOCTOU (time-of-check to time-of-use) symlink race conditions in multiple path-based syscalls (chmod, lchown, utimes, rename, unlink, mkdir, symlink, mknod, link, rmdir, lstat). Local attackers with filesystem access can swap symlinks during the window between path resolution and syscall execution to redirect file operations outside the intended rsync module boundary, allowing arbitrary permission, ownership, timestamp, or filename manipulation on systems running rsync daemons with 'use chroot = no'.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed rsync versionRun 'rsync --version' and examine the output for the version number (e.g., 'rsync version 3.4.2' or lower)Affected if The version displayed is 3.4.2 or any version prior to 3.4.2
-
Confirm rsync daemon mode is in useCheck for running rsync daemon process: 'ps aux | grep rsyncd' or look for rsyncd.conf configuration file typically located at /etc/rsyncd.conf or /etc/rsync/rsyncd.confAffected if rsync is running as a daemon (rsyncd) and accepts connections from clients
-
Locate rsyncd.conf configurationSearch for rsyncd.conf in common locations: /etc/rsyncd.conf, /etc/rsync/rsyncd.conf, or check the path specified by 'rsync --daemon --config=/path/to/rsyncd.conf'Affected if An rsyncd.conf file exists and is being used to run the rsync daemon
-
Check use chroot setting in rsyncd.confOpen the rsyncd.conf file and search for 'use chroot' directive within any [module] section or global section. Run 'grep -i "use chroot" /path/to/rsyncd.conf' to find the settingAffected if The 'use chroot' directive is set to 'no' or is absent (default is often 'yes' in some versions, but verify explicitly)
-
Verify module path boundariesExamine each module section in rsyncd.conf (lines starting with [modulename]) and check the 'path' directive to identify what directories are being exportedAffected if Modules export paths that contain or link to sensitive directories outside the intended module boundary
You are affected if running rsync 3.4.2 or prior as a daemon with 'use chroot = no' or missing the chroot directive, allowing symlink race conditions to escape module boundaries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedEnable 'use chroot = yes' in rsync daemon configuration to constrain filesystem access, or upgrade to a patched rsync version when available. Additionally, limit local filesystem access permissions to prevent symlink manipulation by untrusted users.
Rsync 3.4.3 or later stable release
- 1. Check current Rsync version by running: rsync --version
- 2. Identify the package manager used (apt, yum, dnf, brew, etc.)
- 3. For Debian/Ubuntu: Run 'sudo apt update && sudo apt install rsync' to get the latest available version
- 4. For RHEL/CentOS/Fedora: Run 'sudo dnf update rsync' or 'sudo yum update rsync'
- 5. For macOS with Homebrew: Run 'brew upgrade rsync'
- 6. Alternatively, download latest Rsync source from rsync.samba.org and compile: git clone https://github.com/RsyncProject/rsync.git && cd rsync && ./configure && make && sudo make install
- 7. Verify the new version is installed: rsync --version
- 8. If running as a daemon (rsyncd), ensure configuration file (/etc/rsyncd.conf) sets 'use chroot = yes' as a defense-in-depth measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43619 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43619 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data