CVE-2026-43620
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRsync version 3.4.2 and prior contain a receiver-side out-of-bounds array read vulnerability in recv_files() in receiver.c that allows a malicious rsync server to crash the rsync client process. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by setting CF_INC_RECURSE in compatibility flags and sending a specially crafted file list where the first sorted entry is not the leading dot directory, followed by a transfer record with ndx=0 and an iflag word without ITEM_TRANSFER, causing the receiver to read 8 bytes before the allocated pointer array and dereference an invalid pointer at an unmapped address, resulting in a deterministic SIGSEGV crash of the rsync client.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRsync versions 3.4.2 and prior contain a receiver-side out-of-bounds array read vulnerability in recv_files() in receiver.c. A malicious rsync server can crash the client by sending a specially crafted file list with CF_INC_RECURSE set, causing the receiver to read 8 bytes before the allocated pointer array and dereference an invalid pointer, resulting in a deterministic SIGSEGV.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.4.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed rsync versionRun 'rsync --version' or 'rsync -V' to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if Version is 3.4.2 or any prior version
-
Determine if rsync operates as clientReview crontabs, scripts, and running processes for rsync commands using remote server syntax (user@host::module or rsync://)Affected if rsync is used to pull or push data to remote servers
-
Map rsync server connectionsInventory all remote rsync server destinations referenced in configuration files, scripts, and automationAffected if connections to untrusted or unknown rsync servers exist
Environment is affected if running rsync version 3.4.2 or prior AND the rsync client connects to remote servers
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate rsync to a version beyond 3.4.2 when available. Until then, avoid connecting to untrusted or unverified rsync servers, as the vulnerability is triggered by malicious server responses.
rsync 3.4.3 or later stable release (check rsync.samba.org for the latest version)
- 1. Check the current installed rsync version by running: rsync --version
- 2. If the installed version is 3.4.2 or earlier, plan to upgrade to a fixed version.
- 3. Obtain the latest stable rsync release from the official rsync repository at rsync.samba.org or your distribution's package manager.
- 4. Verify that the fixed version addresses this specific vulnerability by checking the rsync release notes or changelog.
- 5. After upgrading, test rsync operations to ensure normal functionality.
- 6. If upgrading is not immediately possible, consider network-level mitigations such as restricting which rsync servers clients can connect to, to avoid connecting to untrusted malicious servers.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43620 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43620 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data