CVE-2026-43633
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHestiaCP versions 1.9.0 through 1.9.4 contain a deserialization vulnerability in the web terminal component caused by a session format mismatch between PHP and Node.js that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to achieve root-level code execution. Attackers can inject crafted data into HTTP headers that are processed by the PHP session handler but incorrectly deserialized by the Node.js web terminal component as trusted session values, resulting in arbitrary command execution on systems with the web terminal feature enabled.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHestiaCP versions 1.9.0-1.9.4 have a deserialization vulnerability in the web terminal component caused by a session format mismatch between PHP and Node.js. Attackers can inject crafted data into HTTP headers that PHP processes as session data, which the Node.js web terminal then deserializes as trusted session values, enabling unauthenticated remote code execution with root privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify HestiaCP versionRun 'v-list-sys-info' or check /usr/local/hestia/bin/hestia version file to see the installed HestiaCP version numberAffected if Version is 1.9.0, 1.9.1, 1.9.2, 1.9.3, or 1.9.4
-
Verify web terminal is enabledCheck the HestiaCP control panel settings or examine the web terminal configuration file in /usr/local/hestia/data/templates/web/ for terminal-related configs; look for 'terminal' or 'webshell' in enabled featuresAffected if The web terminal feature is active or installed
-
Confirm PHP component is in useCheck if PHP is installed as part of HestiaCP by running 'php -v' or examining installed packages, and verify the web frontend uses PHP handlersAffected if PHP is handling web requests for the control panel
-
Confirm Node.js component is in useCheck for Node.js installation via 'node -v' or look for Node.js processes related to HestiaCP in running processes; examine if any HestiaCP services use Node.jsAffected if Node.js is installed and running as part of HestiaCP services
-
Inspect HTTP header session handlingReview web server configuration (nginx/apache) for how session cookies and headers are passed between PHP and any Node.js components; check for proxy rules that forward headers to both backend typesAffected if HTTP headers are forwarded to both PHP and Node.js backends without sanitization
You are affected if running HestiaCP version 1.9.0 through 1.9.4 with the web terminal feature enabled and both PHP and Node.js components handling sessions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedDisable the web terminal feature immediately until a patched version is available. If the feature must remain enabled, restrict network access to the web terminal endpoints at the network perimeter as a temporary control.
HestiaCP 1.9.5 or later (latest stable release)
- 1. Identify if the HestiaCP web terminal feature is enabled on the system (this feature is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
- 2. Check the currently installed HestiaCP version using: 'v-list-sys-hestia' or checking the admin panel
- 3. If running version 1.9.0 through 1.9.4 and web terminal is enabled, upgrade to the latest HestiaCP release (version 1.9.5 or later which contains the security fix)
- 4. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed: 'v-list-sys-hestia'
- 5. Review and restart the web terminal service if necessary to ensure the patched components are loaded
- 6. Check HestiaCP official release notes for version 1.9.5 or later to confirm the deserialization fix is included
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43633 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43633 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data