CVE-2026-4368
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRace Condition in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when appliance is configured as Gateway (SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server leading to User Session Mixup
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition exists in NetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway when configured as a Gateway virtual server (SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server. This vulnerability can cause user session mixup, potentially allowing one user to access or interact with another user's session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NetScaler deployment typeConfirm whether NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway is deployed in your environment by checking the system information or license details.Affected if The system is running NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway software.
-
Check for Gateway virtual server configurationUse the NetScaler command line (show vserver) or GUI to list all configured virtual servers and identify any with type SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, or RDP Proxy.Affected if A Gateway virtual server is configured with SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, or RDP Proxy service type.
-
Check for AAA virtual server configurationUse the NetScaler command line (show aaa vserver) or GUI to list all AAA virtual servers configured on the system.Affected if One or more AAA virtual servers are configured on the NetScaler appliance.
-
Verify active session handlingReview session logs or use the NetScaler command (show session) during peak usage to observe whether multiple user sessions are being processed concurrently on affected virtual servers.Affected if Users report experiencing sessions belonging to other users or unexpected session behavior on Gateway or AAA virtual servers.
Your environment is affected if you run NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway with any Gateway virtual server (SSL VPN, ICA Proxy, CVPN, RDP Proxy) or AAA virtual server configured, as the race condition only triggers when these specific configurations are active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor-provided patch for CVE-2026-4368. If a patch is unavailable, consider restricting access to affected Gateway and AAA virtual server configurations pending remediation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4368 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4368 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data