CVE-2026-43869
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Validation of Certificate with Host Mismatch vulnerability in Apache Thrift. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.23.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.23.0, which fixes the issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Thrift before version 0.23.0 contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability where the library fails to properly validate that the TLS/SSL certificate's host name matches the intended target host. This allows attackers performing man-in-the-middle attacks to intercept encrypted communications by presenting a valid certificate for a different host.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.23.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Thrift versionRun 'thrift --version' or check your project's dependency management system (Maven, pip, npm, etc.) for the installed Thrift library versionAffected if The installed version is below 0.23.0 (any version 0.x.y where x < 23, or any version < 0.23.0)
-
Determine if SSL/TLS transport is in useReview your Thrift configuration files and application code for the use of TSocketSSL, TSSLSocket, or any SSL/TLS-enabled transport layerAffected if SSL/TLS transport is enabled and the Thrift version is below 0.23.0
-
Verify client/server TLS certificate validation settingsInspect your Thrift client or server initialization code for SSLContext setup, particularly checking whether hostname verification or certificate validation is configuredAffected if Host mismatch validation is not explicitly enforced and the Thrift version is below 0.23.0
You are affected if Apache Thrift version is below 0.23.0 AND SSL/TLS transport is actively used for client or server communications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped0.23.0
Upgrade Apache Thrift to version 0.23.0 or later to resolve the certificate host mismatch validation issue.
0.23.0
- Identify all deployments and applications using Apache Thrift versions prior to 0.23.0
- Download Apache Thrift version 0.23.0 from the official Apache Thrift distribution (thrift.apache.org) or trusted package repositories
- Replace the existing Thrift library binaries or dependencies with version 0.23.0
- Rebuild and recompile any applications that link against the Thrift library
- Verify that TLS/SSL certificate validation now properly checks for hostname mismatches (CWE-297 fix)
- Deploy the updated applications to production environments
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43869 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- lists.apache.org
- www.openwall.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- access.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- security.access.redhat.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43869 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data