CVE-2026-43889
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOutline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. Prior to 1.7.0, the shares.create API accepts both collectionId and documentId simultaneously and, when published=false, only verifies read access for each—skipping the "share" permission check. A subsequent shares.update authorizes publication using an OR policy (can share collection OR can share document), so an attacker who holds share permission on one unrelated collection can publish a share that exposes an arbitrary document they cannot legitimately share, making it publicly accessible to unauthenticated users. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Outline versions prior to 1.7.0, the shares.create API accepts both collectionId and documentId parameters simultaneously. When published=false, it only verifies read access for each—skipping the required 'share' permission check. The subsequent shares.update then authorizes publication using an OR policy (can share collection OR can share document), allowing an attacker with share permission on any one collection to publish and expose arbitrary documents they can read but cannot legitimately share, making them publicly accessible to unauthenticated users.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Outline versionLocate the Outline version by checking the application package.json, docker image tag, or running 'outline version' command if available. Compare against 1.7.0.Affected if Installed version is prior to 1.7.0
-
Verify shares.create API accepts both collectionId and documentIdReview the API endpoint handler for shares.create in the Outline codebase or test the API by sending a request with both collectionId and documentId parameters set.Affected if The API accepts both parameters simultaneously without validation error
-
Check share permission enforcement on shares.createExamine the authorization logic in shares.create to verify whether it checks for 'share' permission when published=false. Look for missing permission validation when both collectionId and documentId are provided.Affected if The shares.create API only verifies read access without checking share permission when published=false
-
Check shares.update authorization policyReview the authorization logic in shares.update to determine if it uses an OR policy (can share collection OR can share document) for publication authorization.Affected if The shares.update uses an OR policy allowing publication if user can share either the collection OR the document
-
Verify share permission configurationCheck the share permission settings in Outline admin panel or database to confirm whether users with share permission on any collection can access documents they cannot legitimately share.Affected if Share permissions are configured to allow users to publish arbitrary readable documents they lack explicit share permission for
A user is affected if their Outline installation version is prior to 1.7.0 and the shares.create API allows simultaneous collectionId/documentId submission with insufficient permission checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Outline version 1.7.0 or later, which implements proper share permission verification during both shares.create and shares.update operations.
1.7.0
- 1. Back up your current Outline installation and database before proceeding with the upgrade
- 2. Consult the official Outline upgrade documentation for your deployment method (Docker, npm, etc.)
- 3. Upgrade Outline to version 1.7.0 or later
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the application version
- 5. Test the shares.create and shares.update API functionality to confirm the authorization fix is working correctly
- 6. Review access controls to ensure no unintended shares were created during the vulnerability window
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43889 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43889 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data