CVE-2026-43890
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOutline is a service that allows for collaborative documentation. From 0.84.0 to 1.7.0, the subscriptions.create API endpoint in server/routes/api/subscriptions/subscriptions.ts exhibits a broken authorization pattern. When both collectionId and documentId are supplied in the request, the route handler authorizes ONLY the collection branch (line 125 if (collectionId)), while the downstream subscriptionCreator command at server/commands/subscriptionCreator.ts writes the subscription against the documentId (which was never validated). The result is a subscription record pinning the attacker's user to a victim document the attacker has no read access to, on any team in the instance. The schema (server/routes/api/subscriptions/schema.ts) only enforces "at least one of collectionId/documentId" via .refine() — it does NOT enforce mutual exclusivity, so passing both is a valid, schema-conforming request. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Outline versions 0.84.0 to 1.7.0, the subscriptions.create API endpoint has a broken authorization pattern where it only validates collectionId when both collectionId and documentId are provided. The subscriptionCreator command then writes against the unvalidated documentId, allowing attackers to subscribe to victim documents they have no access to across any team in the instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Outline server versionCheck the installed Outline version by querying the API health endpoint, checking the package.json file, or using the command line tool if available (e.g., outline --version or checking docker container tags)Affected if Version is 0.84.0 through 1.7.0 inclusive
-
Verify API authentication is enforcedReview the Outline server configuration to confirm that API authentication (api.authentication: true) is enabled in the configuration file or environment variablesAffected if API authentication is disabled or misconfigured, allowing unauthenticated or insufficiently authorized API access
-
Inspect subscription records for unauthorized accessQuery the database for subscription records where the user_id does not have explicit access to the associated document_id (check the subscriptions table joined with documents or document_shares)Affected if Subscription records exist where the subscriber lacks proper document access permissions
-
Review API access logs for subscriptions.create endpointExamine API request logs for calls to the subscriptions.create endpoint that reference documentIds outside the caller's authorized collectionsAffected if API logs show subscription.create requests with documentIds the requester should not have access to
You are affected if your Outline version is between 0.84.0 and 1.7.0 and the subscriptions.create endpoint is accessible to users who should not have access to certain documents.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Outline version 1.7.1 or later which contains the fix for this authorization bypass.
1.7.1
- Upgrade Outline from any version between 0.84.0 and 1.7.0 to version 1.7.1 or later
- After upgrading, verify the subscriptions.create endpoint now correctly rejects requests where both collectionId and documentId are provided, or properly validates both fields
- Confirm that users can no longer subscribe to documents they do not have access to via the API
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43890 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43890 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data