CVE-2026-43942
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedelecterm is an open-sourced terminal/ssh/sftp/telnet/serialport/RDP/VNC/Spice/ftp client. In versions 3.8.15 and prior, the getConstants() IPC handler in src/app/lib/ipc-sync.js serialises the entire process.env object and sends it to the renderer. The data is stored as window.pre.env and is accessible from any JavaScript running in the renderer (e.g., via the DevTools console or a compromised webview context). An attacker who achieves any JavaScript execution within the renderer can trivially exfiltrate these secrets to a remote server, leading to cloud account compromise, supply chain attacks, and lateral movement. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe getConstants() IPC handler in electerm versions 3.8.15 and prior serializes the entire process.env object and sends it to the renderer process, where it becomes accessible as window.pre.env. Any JavaScript executing in the renderer (including via DevTools or compromised webviews) can access these environment variables, which typically contain secrets, API keys, tokens, and credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.8.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check electerm installed versionRun 'electerm --version' or check the application's About/Version info to determine the installed version numberAffected if The installed version is 3.8.15 or any version prior to 3.8.15 (e.g., 3.8.14, 3.8.10, etc.)
-
Inspect getConstants IPC handler sourceExamine the electerm source code for the getConstants() function in the IPC handlers; verify if it returns the full process.env object without filteringAffected if The getConstants() function returns the complete process.env object rather than selective non-sensitive configuration
-
Verify window.pre.env exposure in rendererOpen the electerm application, open browser DevTools (F12), and check if window.pre.env is defined and contains environment variablesAffected if window.pre.env exists and displays process.env properties such as PATH, USER, HOME, or any custom environment variables set in the system
A user is affected if electerm version is 3.8.15 or prior AND the window.pre.env object is accessible in the renderer, exposing the full process.env contents including any secrets or credentials present in the environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUntil a patch is released, avoid running electerm with sensitive credentials in the environment variables. The vendor should modify getConstants() to selectively expose only non-sensitive configuration values instead of the entire process.env object.
- Monitor the official electerm GitHub repository (github.com/electerm/electerm) for security updates or patches addressing the process.env exposure vulnerability.
- Consider reaching out to the project maintainers to inquire about the status of a fix.
- If using electerm in a security-sensitive environment, implement network segmentation or additional monitoring to detect any unauthorized exfiltration attempts.
- Review application logs and network traffic for indicators of compromise related to this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-43942 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-43942 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data