CVE-2026-44015
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNginx UI is a web user interface for the Nginx web server. In 2.3.4 and earlier, an authenticated user can perform Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) by creating a cluster node pointing to an arbitrary internal URL and then sending API requests with the X-Node-ID header. The Proxy middleware forwards these requests to the attacker-specified internal address, bypassing network segmentation and enabling access to services bound to localhost or internal networks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceNginx UI versions 2.3.4 and earlier contain an authenticated SSRF vulnerability in the Proxy middleware. Attackers with valid user credentials can create a cluster node configuration pointing to an arbitrary internal URL (such as localhost or internal network addresses) and then trigger forwarding of API requests by specifying the X-Node-ID header, effectively bypassing network segmentation controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Nginx UI versionCheck the Docker container image tag or running container version using 'docker ps' and 'docker images | grep nginx-ui', or check any package manager installation recordsAffected if The version is 2.3.4 or earlier
-
Verify if proxy/cluster node functionality is accessibleLog into the Nginx UI administrative interface and navigate to the Proxy or Cluster Node configuration section. If these menu items exist and are accessible to your user account, the feature is enabledAffected if The Proxy or Cluster Node configuration interface is accessible to your user account
-
Inspect existing cluster node configurationsWithin Nginx UI, review any existing cluster node configurations for entries pointing to internal addresses (127.0.0.1, localhost, 192.168.x.x, 10.x.x.x, or other RFC 1918 private network ranges)Affected if Any cluster node is configured to point to internal/local network addresses that should not be externally accessible
-
Review access logs for X-Node-ID headersExamine Nginx UI access logs for incoming requests containing the 'X-Node-ID' header. Check both Nginx UI logs and any reverse proxy logs in front of itAffected if Requests with X-Node-ID headers are present in logs, especially pointing to internal services or localhost
-
Confirm user authentication is properly configuredVerify that Nginx UI requires authentication and that user accounts are not using default or weak credentials. Check the authentication settings in the configuration panelAffected if Anonymous access is permitted or shared/default credentials are in use
A user is affected if they are running Nginx UI version 2.3.4 or earlier with the cluster node/proxy feature accessible to authenticated users who can configure nodes pointing to internal network addresses.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to a version newer than 2.3.4. If no patched version is available, implement strict network access controls, disable the cluster node functionality for untrusted users, and monitor for suspicious X-Node-ID header usage.
Nginx UI version 2.3.5 or later
- 1. Backup your current Nginx UI configuration and data
- 2. Upgrade Nginx UI to version 2.3.5 or later which contains the fix for this SSRF vulnerability
- 3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version number
- 4. Review and test the cluster node functionality to ensure legitimate features still work
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44015 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44015 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data