CVE-2026-44294
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedprotobufjs compiles protobuf definitions into JavaScript (JS) functions. Prior to 7.5.6 and 8.0.2, protobufjs generated JavaScript property accessors from schema-controlled field and oneof names. Certain control characters in field names were not escaped before being embedded into generated function bodies. A crafted schema or JSON descriptor could therefore cause generated encode, decode, verify, or conversion functions to fail during compilation. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.5.6 and 8.0.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceprotobufjs fails to escape certain control characters in protobuf field and oneof names when generating JavaScript property accessors for function bodies. When a crafted schema or JSON descriptor containing these control characters is processed, the generated encode, decode, verify, or conversion functions fail during JavaScript compilation, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.5.6>= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed protobufjs versionRun 'npm list protobufjs' or check the package.json dependencies for the protobufjs version numberAffected if The version is less than 7.5.6, or greater than or equal to 8.0.0 but less than 8.0.2
-
Determine if protobuf schemas are being loaded from untrusted sourcesReview the application code to see if protobuf schema files (proto or JSON descriptors) are loaded from user input, external APIs, or other untrusted sourcesAffected if Untrusted or user-supplied protobuf schemas are being processed by protobufjs
-
Check if encoding, decoding, or verify functions fail during executionMonitor application logs or test the protobuf encode/decode/verify operations for JavaScript compilation errors related to generated property accessorsAffected if JavaScript compilation errors occur in generated encode, decode, verify, or conversion functions when processing certain schemas
-
Inspect the protobuf schema for control characters in field or oneof namesExamine any protobuf schema files or JSON descriptors for unusual characters (especially control characters like newlines, tabs, or null bytes) in field_names or oneof_name valuesAffected if The schema contains control characters in field or oneof names that would cause the generated accessor code to fail JavaScript compilation
A user is affected if they are running a vulnerable protobufjs version AND processing schemas (especially from untrusted sources) that contain control characters in field or oneof names, causing encode/decode/verify operations to fail with JavaScript compilation errors.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.5.68.0.2
Upgrade protobufjs to version 7.5.6 (for 7.x users) or 8.0.2 (for 8.x users) or later. Additionally, validate and sanitize any protobuf schemas or JSON descriptors from untrusted sources before processing.
protobufjs 7.5.6 (for 7.x users) or protobufjs 8.0.2 (for 8.x users)
- Check your current protobufjs version by running: npm list protobufjs
- If you are using protobufjs 7.x (version < 7.5.6), upgrade to version 7.5.6: npm install [email protected]
- If you are using protobufjs 8.x (version 8.0.0 or 8.1.1), upgrade to version 8.0.2: npm install [email protected]
- Verify the upgrade was successful: npm list protobufjs
- Re-run your build/compile process to ensure generated code works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44294 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data