CVE-2026-44341
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedGoJobs is a REST API for a Job Board platform. The application exposes a job retrieval endpoint that allows unauthenticated users to access job details by directly manipulating object identifiers. The endpoint lacks proper authentication and authorization checks, resulting in unauthorized access to job data.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceGoJobs REST API job retrieval endpoint suffers from an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability. The endpoint accepts object identifiers (likely job IDs in the URL path or parameters) without verifying the requesting user's identity or authorization, allowing any unauthenticated attacker to access sensitive job data by manipulating these identifiers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if GoJobs REST API is deployedCheck your web server logs, application inventory, or running services for instances of GoJobs REST API. Look for endpoints that serve job-related functionality.Affected if GoJobs REST API is running and accessible on your network.
-
Locate the job retrieval endpointReview your API documentation or perform path discovery (e.g., common paths like /api/jobs, /jobs/{id}, /job/{id}, /api/v1/jobs) to identify the job retrieval endpoint.Affected if A job retrieval endpoint exists and accepts identifiers in the URL path or query parameters.
-
Test unauthenticated access to job dataSend an HTTP GET request to the job retrieval endpoint with a job ID (e.g., /api/jobs/1) without including any authentication headers, tokens, or cookies.Affected if The endpoint returns job data without requiring any authentication credentials.
-
Verify lack of authorization checksSend requests with different job IDs (sequential or random) to the endpoint without authentication. Compare if each request returns the corresponding job data.Affected if Different job IDs return different sensitive job data without any ownership or permission verification.
-
Inspect API configuration for authentication settingsCheck the API configuration files, middleware settings, or authentication middleware code to see if the job retrieval endpoint is explicitly protected with authorization logic.Affected if No authorization or ownership verification logic is configured for the job retrieval endpoint.
Your environment is affected if GoJobs REST API job retrieval endpoint returns job data to unauthenticated users without verifying their authorization to access that specific job resource.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper authentication and authorization checks on the job retrieval endpoint to verify the requesting user has legitimate access to the requested job resource before returning any data.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44341 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44341 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data