Missing AuthenticationWeakness · CWE-306

CVE-2026-4436

HIGH · 8.6 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-04-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A low-privileged remote attacker can send Modbus packets to manipulate register values that are inputs to the odorant injection logic such that too much or too little odorant is injected into a gas line.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A vulnerability in gas odorization control systems allows a low-privileged remote attacker to manipulate Modbus register values that control odorant injection logic, causing excessive or insufficient odorant to be injected into natural gas lines. This affects safety-critical systems where odorant (typically mercaptan) enables leak detection.

MitigationImplement Modbus authentication and input validation to reject unauthorized register writes; add rate limiting and anomaly detection on Modbus traffic; ensure physical interlocks or independent safety systems can override erroneous injection commands.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify gas odorization control systems
    Inventory your industrial control systems (ICS/SCADA) to locate any systems controlling odorant injection in natural gas distribution infrastructure. Check for PLCs, RTUs, or DCS systems specifically managing mercaptan or other odorant injection.
    Affected if You have deployed gas odorization control systems in your natural gas infrastructure.
  2. Verify Modbus exposure
    Review network segmentation and access controls for ICS networks. Check if Modbus (TCP/502 or serial) is accessible from less-trusted network zones or allows remote/IP-based connections.
    Affected if Modbus communication is exposed to network segments accessible by low-privileged or untrusted users.
  3. Check Modbus authentication
    Audit Modbus device configurations and network policies to determine whether authentication, encryption, or allow-listing is required for write operations to holding registers.
    Affected if Modbus write commands to holding registers do not require authentication or authorization checks.
  4. Inspect odorant injection register access
    Review Modbus register maps for your odorization controller. Identify holding registers (typically 40000-49999 range) controlling injection pump speed, valve positions, or injection timing. Check if these are writable without privilege elevation.
    Affected if Modbus registers controlling odorant injection parameters are writable by low-privileged or unauthenticated remote attackers.
  5. Review input validation on write commands
    Examine the odorization controller logic or firmware to determine if range checking, rate limiting, or sanity validation is performed on incoming Modbus write requests before applying them to physical outputs.
    Affected if No input validation or range limits exist on Modbus write operations affecting odorant injection parameters.

You are affected if your gas odorization system uses Modbus-accessible controls for odorant injection without authentication, authorization, or input validation on register writes.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement Modbus authentication and input validation to reject unauthorized register writes; add rate limiting and anomaly detection on Modbus traffic; ensure physical interlocks or independent safety systems can override erroneous injection commands.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing16.0 h
  • Review / QA12.0 h
60.0 hours of engineering $10,480
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $16,768.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4436 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4436 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data