CVE-2026-44390
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNLnet Labs Unbound up to and including version 1.25.0 has a vulnerability when handling replies with very large RRsets that Unbound needs to perform name compression for. Malicious upstream responses with very large RRsets with records that don't share a suffix above the root can cause Unbound to spend a considerable time applying name compression to downstream replies. This can lead to degraded performance and eventually denial of service in well orchestrated attacks. An adversary can exploit the vulnerability by querying Unbound for the specially crafted contents of a malicious zone with very large RRsets. Before Unbound replies to the query it will try to apply name compression which was an unbounded operation that could lock the CPU until the whole packet was complete. A compression limit was introduced in 1.21.1 for this but it didn't account for the case where records would not share any suffix above the root. That causes Unbound to go in a different code path because of the compression tree lookup failure and eventually not increment the compression counter for those operations. Unbound 1.25.1 contains a patch with a fix that increments the compression counter regardless of the compression tree lookup. This is a complement fix to CVE-2024-8508.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceUnbound up to 1.25.0 contains an unbounded name compression vulnerability when processing DNS replies with very large RRsets where records don't share a suffix above the root. The compression counter introduced in 1.21.1 is not incremented in this specific code path due to compression tree lookup failure, causing unbounded CPU consumption that leads to degraded performance or denial of service. This is a complement fix to CVE-2024-8508.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.25.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Unbound DNS resolver is installedRun 'unbound -h' or 'which unbound' to locate the Unbound binaryAffected if The command fails or unbound is not found - Unbound is not present
-
Determine the installed Unbound versionRun 'unbound -h 2>&1 | head -1' or 'unbound -V' to display version information. Compare the version number to the affected range (< 1.25.1)Affected if Version shown is 1.25.0 or earlier (any version below 1.25.1)
-
Verify the Unbound service is actively runningRun 'systemctl status unbound' or 'service unbound status' depending on your init systemAffected if Service is running - the vulnerable code path is active when Unbound processes DNS queries and upstream responses
-
Confirm DNS resolver functionality is enabledCheck the configuration file (typically /etc/unbound/unbound.conf) for 'interface:' directives and ensure local DNS service is bound to an addressAffected if Unbound is configured to listen on network interfaces and resolve queries - the compression vulnerability applies to any upstream response processing
A user is affected if Unbound is installed and running with any version below 1.25.1, as the name compression flaw triggers during normal DNS response processing from upstream servers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.25.1
Upgrade Unbound to version 1.25.1 or later, which contains the fix that increments the compression counter regardless of compression tree lookup results.
1.25.1
- Check current Unbound version using 'unbound -V' or 'unbound-control version'
- Stop the Unbound service using 'systemctl stop unbound' or the appropriate command for your system
- Upgrade Unbound to version 1.25.1 using your system's package manager (e.g., 'apt-get install unbound=1.25.1' or 'yum install unbound-1.25.1')
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
- Restart the Unbound service using 'systemctl start unbound' or the appropriate command
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,464.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44390 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44390 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data