CVE-2026-44400
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMailEnable Enterprise Premium 10.55 and earlier contains an improper authorization vulnerability in the WebAdmin mobile portal that allows attackers to bypass authentication checks by reusing AuthenticationToken cookies generated for low-privileged users. Attackers can obtain a token from the WebMail login endpoint using the PersistentLogin parameter and replay it against the WebAdmin portal to perform highly privileged administrative actions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMailEnable Enterprise Premium 10.55 and earlier has an improper authorization vulnerability where AuthenticationToken cookies generated for low-privileged WebMail users can be replayed against the WebAdmin mobile portal to bypass authentication checks and perform highly privileged administrative actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.56CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check MailEnable versionOpen MailEnable Administrator, go to the About section, or check the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Mail Enable\Mail Enable\VersionAffected if The installed version is 10.55 or earlier (less than 10.56)
-
Verify WebMail is enabledIn MailEnable Administrator, expand Services > Protocols > HTTP and confirm the WebMail service is running and enabledAffected if WebMail is enabled and accessible to users
-
Confirm WebAdmin mobile portal is accessibleAttempt to access the WebAdmin mobile portal URL (typically /mewebmail/Mobile/) or check if port 8080 or 443 is listening for WebAdmin requestsAffected if WebAdmin mobile portal is exposed and accepts authentication tokens
-
Identify low-privilege WebMail accountsIn MailEnable Administrator, review user accounts in the WebMail domain and note which accounts have Standard or Guest-level privileges rather than Administrator privilegesAffected if Low-privilege WebMail users exist in the system
-
Check for token scope validationInspect WebAdmin configuration files (MEWebAdmin.config or similar in the WebAdmin directory) for AuthenticationToken validation settings, specifically looking for whether tokens are validated for scope or authorization levelAffected if Token scope validation is not implemented or is misconfigured to allow cross-interface token replay
The environment is affected if MailEnable version is below 10.56 AND both WebMail and WebAdmin mobile portal are enabled, allowing a low-privilege user's AuthenticationToken to be replayed for admin actions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.56
Implement proper token scope validation in WebAdmin to ensure tokens are tied to their original authorization level, and reject tokens generated for lower-privilege interfaces.
MailEnable Enterprise Premium 10.56 or later
- 1. Verify current MailEnable installation version by checking the About section in WebAdmin or using the version information in the installation directory.
- 2. Download MailEnable Enterprise Premium version 10.56 or later from the official MailEnable website (www.mailenable.com).
- 3. Before upgrading, backup the MailEnable configuration, especially the AuthenticationToken settings and user accounts.
- 4. Apply the upgrade installation on the server, following the standard MailEnable upgrade procedure.
- 5. After upgrade, verify the WebAdmin mobile portal now properly validates authentication tokens across privilege levels.
- 6. Confirm that tokens generated for low-privileged users can no longer be reused to access privileged administrative functions in WebAdmin.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44400 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44400 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data