CVE-2026-44470
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Claude Desktop app gives you Claude Code with a graphical interface built for running multiple sessions side by side. Prior to 1.3834.0, the CoworkVMService component in Claude Desktop for Windows ran as SYSTEM and did not validate whether the VM bundle directory was a real directory or an NTFS directory junction before creating files within it. A local non-elevated user could replace the user-writable VM bundle directory with a directory junction pointing to an attacker-chosen location, causing the service to create a SYSTEM-owned file in an arbitrary directory. This could be leveraged for local privilege escalation. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.3834.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Claude Desktop's CoworkVMService (versions prior to 1.3834.0) on Windows. The service runs as SYSTEM and fails to validate whether the user-writable VM bundle directory is a real directory or an NTFS directory junction before creating files. A local non-elevated attacker can replace the VM bundle directory with a directory junction pointing to an arbitrary location, causing the SYSTEM-owned service to create files in attacker-controlled locations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3834.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Claude Desktop is installedCheck for Claude Desktop installation directory or in Add/Remove ProgramsAffected if Claude Desktop is installed and version cannot be determined or is below 1.3834.0
-
Check installed Claude Desktop versionLocate Claude Desktop executable and query its version (typically via file properties or --version flag)Affected if The installed version is earlier than 1.3834.0
-
Identify CoworkVMServiceOpen Windows Services management console (services.msc) and locate the CoworkVMService, or run 'sc query CoworkVMService'Affected if The CoworkVMService exists and runs under the SYSTEM account (Log On As shows LocalSystem)
-
Locate VM bundle directoryExamine service configuration or Claude Desktop data directories to find the path to the VM bundle storage locationAffected if The VM bundle directory path is writable by a non-elevated user and is located in a user-accessible location
-
Check if VM bundle directory is a junctionUse 'fsutil reparsepoint query <directory_path>' or check with 'dir /aL' command to see if the directory is an NTFS reparse point or junctionAffected if The VM bundle directory is actually a directory junction (reparse point) pointing to an alternate location, allowing an attacker to redirect file creation
A user is affected if Claude Desktop version is below 1.3834.0, the CoworkVMService runs as SYSTEM, and the VM bundle directory is a writable location that could be replaced with a directory junction by a local attacker.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3834.0
Upgrade Claude Desktop to version 1.3834.0 or later to obtain the fix that validates directory types before file operations.
Claude Desktop 1.3834.0 or later
- 1. Ensure you have a backup of your Claude Desktop configuration if needed.
- 2. Download Claude Desktop version 1.3834.0 or later from the official Anthropic website or GitHub releases.
- 3. Uninstall the current version of Claude Desktop from your Windows system.
- 4. Install the updated Claude Desktop version 1.3834.0 or later.
- 5. Verify the installation was successful by checking the installed version in the application settings.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44470 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44470 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data