Interschalt Vdr G4e FirmwareOperating system · Macgregor

CVE-2026-44611

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-05-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.250 or later.
See remediation →
56/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Danelec MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder passwords are stored with a hashing method which limits password length and is susceptible to brute force attacks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Danelec MacGregor Voyage Data Recorder stores passwords using a hashing method that limits maximum password length, reducing the effective entropy of passwords and making them vulnerable to brute force attacks. This weak cryptographic storage allows attackers who obtain the password hashes to more easily recover plaintext passwords.

MitigationUpdate the password hashing mechanism to use a modern, salted key derivation function such as bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2, and implement proper password length handling. Force password rotation for all existing accounts after applying the update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Interschalt Vdr G4e FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 5.250

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check the VDR G4e firmware version
    Access the Danelec MacGregor VDR G4e web interface and navigate to System > About or System Information page. Alternatively, check the firmware version displayed on the VDR front panel or in the system diagnostics menu.
    Affected if The firmware version is shown as less than 5.250 (for example, 5.249, 5.200, etc.)
  2. Verify password length limit exists
    In the VDR G4e administrative interface, attempt to set or change a user password. Observe whether the system imposes a maximum character limit on password input fields.
    Affected if The system enforces a maximum password length (the vulnerability indicates the hashing method imposes such a limit, so any limit detected suggests the weak hashing is in use)
  3. Check password configuration settings
    Navigate to User Management or Security settings in the VDR G4e interface. Look for any configuration options related to password hashing, encryption, or security policies.
    Affected if Settings indicate legacy or weak password hashing is enabled, or if no modern hashing algorithm (such as bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2) is mentioned or selectable
  4. Review system security logs
    Access the VDR G4e system logs or security audit logs through the administrative interface. Look for indicators of password-related configuration or hashing method details.
    Affected if Logs reference outdated password hashing methods or confirm a maximum password length constraint is active

The environment is affected if the VDR G4e firmware version is below 5.250 and the system imposes a maximum password length limit in its password storage implementation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.250 or later
Fixed in 5.250
Interim mitigation

Update the password hashing mechanism to use a modern, salted key derivation function such as bcrypt, scrypt, or Argon2, and implement proper password length handling. Force password rotation for all existing accounts after applying the update.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Firmware version 5.250

  1. Verify current firmware version of the Interschalt Vdr G4e device
  2. Contact Danelec MacGregor to obtain the firmware version 5.250 or later
  3. Follow vendor-provided procedures to backup current device configuration
  4. Upgrade the firmware to version 5.250 or later following Danelec MacGregor's official upgrade documentation
  5. After upgrade, verify the new firmware version is installed
  6. Change all default/admin passwords to new strong passwords using the updated system
Caveat No specific breaking changes documented in available sources; standard firmware upgrade precautions apply (backup configuration, ensure stable power during upgrade)

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Interschalt Vdr G4e Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44611 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44611 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data