CVE-2026-44693
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPi-hole FTL is the core engine of the Pi-hole network-level advertisement and tracker blocker. Prior to version 6.6.1, Pi-hole FTL contains a race condition vulnerability in the HTTP session management subsystem, introduced with the v6.0 rewrite of the embedded CivetWeb-based web server. This issue has been patched in version 6.6.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePi-hole FTL prior to version 6.6.1 contains a race condition vulnerability in the HTTP session management subsystem, stemming from the v6.0 rewrite of the embedded CivetWeb web server. This race condition in session handling could allow an attacker to potentially manipulate or hijack HTTP sessions due to improper synchronization in concurrent session operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Pi-hole FTL is installedRun command: which pihole-FTL or systemctl status pihole-FTLAffected if Pi-hole FTL is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed Pi-hole FTL versionRun command: pihole -v or pihole-FTL versionAffected if Version displayed is below 6.6.1
-
Verify web interface is enabledCheck /etc/pihole/setupVars.conf for WEB_PASSWORD or WEBINTERFACE=true, or check if lighttpd/civetweb service is runningAffected if Web interface is enabled and version is below 6.6.1
-
Check if HTTP sessions are in useInspect active network connections on ports 80/443 or check if the admin interface is accessibleAffected if Web interface is accessible and version is below 6.6.1
The environment is affected if Pi-hole FTL version is below 6.6.1 and the web interface is enabled/accessible, as the race condition exists in the HTTP session management of the embedded CivetWeb server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Pi-hole FTL to version 6.6.1 or later to patch the race condition vulnerability in the HTTP session management subsystem.
Pi-hole FTL version 6.6.1
- 1. Backup your current Pi-hole configuration and data
- 2. Update the Pi-hole repository: `pihole -up` or `sudo pihole -up`
- 3. Alternatively, manually update Pi-hole FTL by downloading version 6.6.1 from the official Pi-hole GitHub repository
- 4. Verify the installation completed successfully by checking the version: `pihole -v`
- 5. Ensure Pi-hole FTL is running: `sudo systemctl status pihole-FTL`
- 6. Test that the web interface and DNS resolution are functioning correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44693 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44693 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data