CVE-2026-44717
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMCP Calculate Server is a mathematical calculation service based on MCP protocol and SymPy library. Prior to 0.1.1, the use of eval() to evaluate mathematical expressions without proper input sanitization leads to remote code execution. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.1.1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe MCP Calculate Server uses Python's eval() function to evaluate mathematical expressions from user input without sanitization, allowing attackers to inject and execute arbitrary Python code remotely. This is a critical RCE vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) stemming from improper use of eval() instead of SymPy's safe evaluation methods.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate MCP Calculate Server installationSearch for files named 'calculate', 'mcp_calculate', or similar. Check common installation paths like /opt/, /usr/local/, or the user's home directory. Look for Python packages: pip list | grep -i calculateAffected if The MCP Calculate Server is installed on the system
-
Identify the expression handler codeFind Python source files in the installation that handle mathematical expressions. Look for files with functions processing user input for calculations. Common patterns: search for 'eval(', 'calculate', 'expression' in .py filesAffected if Code exists that evaluates mathematical expressions from input
-
Verify eval() is used without sanitizationOpen the expression handler source file and inspect the code that processes input. Look for direct calls to eval() or similar unsafe functions without input validation, sanitization, or use of safe parsing alternativesAffected if The code contains eval() being called on raw user input without validation or safe parsing wrappers
-
Check if the server is network-accessibleDetermine if the MCP Calculate Server exposes a network service (HTTP, socket, or other). Review configuration files, startup scripts, or service definitions for listening ports and bind addressesAffected if The server accepts remote connections and can process expressions from network sources
-
Test for the vulnerabilityIf the server is accessible, send a test mathematical expression containing Python code (e.g., '1+1' as a baseline, then a benign test like '__import__("os").system("echo test")' to observe if code executes). Use caution in production environmentsAffected if Arbitrary Python code in the expression input is executed by the server
-
Check installed versionIf a version can be determined (pip show, package metadata, or --version flag), compare it to the fixed version 0.1.1. The absence of a version or a version below 0.1.1 indicates potential vulnerabilityAffected if The installed version is unknown or lower than 0.1.1
If the MCP Calculate Server is installed and its expression handling code directly uses eval() on unsanitized user input (whether locally or over a network), the environment is affected by CVE-2026-44717.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to version 0.1.1 or later which implements proper input sanitization using SymPy's safe evaluation methods instead of eval(). If upgrade is not possible, replace eval() with SymPy's sympify(evaluate=False) or implement a restricted expression parser.
0.1.1
- Check the current version of MCP Calculate Server installed in your environment
- Upgrade MCP Calculate Server to version 0.1.1 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44717 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44717 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data