CVE-2026-4472
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA security vulnerability has been detected in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /admin/admin_edit_supplier.php. The manipulation of the argument Supplier_Name leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA SQL injection vulnerability exists in itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System 1.0 within the /admin/admin_edit_supplier.php script. The Supplier_Name parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands. With a CVSS score of 9.8, this critical flaw enables complete compromise of the database and potentially the application.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application identityInspect the application's main page, footer, or any about/credits section for the product name 'itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System' and version number 1.0Affected if The installed application is itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System version 1.0
-
Locate the vulnerable scriptCheck if the file /admin/admin_edit_supplier.php exists in the web root directoryAffected if The file /admin/admin_edit_supplier.php is present on the server
-
Verify admin interface accessibilityAttempt to access the /admin/ directory endpoint to confirm it is reachableAffected if The /admin/ administrative interface is accessible without authentication or with valid admin credentials
-
Confirm Supplier_Name parameter usageReview the source code of admin_edit_supplier.php to verify the Supplier_Name parameter is processed in SQL queries without prepared statements or parameterizationAffected if The Supplier_Name parameter is used in SQL queries without proper sanitization or prepared statements
You are affected if the installed system is itsourcecode Online Frozen Foods Ordering System version 1.0 with the /admin/admin_edit_supplier.php file present and the Supplier_Name parameter handled without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataremediate by implementing parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database operations involving the Supplier_Name parameter, combined with proper input validation and output encoding.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-4472 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-4472 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data