Cross-site Scripting (XSS)Weakness · CWE-79

CVE-2026-44746

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Due to a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver JAVA (JDBC Test Servlet), an unauthenticated attacker could craft a URL that embeds a malicious script. If a victim clicks this link, the injected input is processed during web page generation, resulting in the execution of malicious content in the victim's browser. This could allow the attacker to access and/or modify information related to the webclient, impacting the confidentiality and integrity of the application, with no impact to availability.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the JDBC Test Servlet of SAP NetWeaver JAVA. Unauthenticated attackers can craft malicious URLs containing embedded scripts that execute in victims' browsers when clicked, allowing theft of session cookies or manipulation of web content.

MitigationApply SAP security patches for the JDBC Test Servlet or disable the servlet if unused, and implement input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied parameters.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SAP NetWeaver JAVA installation and version
    Locate SAP NetWeaver JAVA installation directory and check version files (e.g., in the usr/sap/<SID> directory, look for version manifest files or use SAP LMNG commands like 'dmptool' or SAP MII version info). Compare your installed version against the affected version range provided by SAP security notes.
    Affected if The installed version falls within the vulnerable version range for this CVE.
  2. Locate the JDBC Test Servlet
    Identify if the JDBC Test Servlet (typically mapped to paths like /JdbcTest or / jdbcTestServlet) is deployed on the SAP NetWeaver JAVA application server. Check the web.xml deployment descriptor in the relevant application or SAP system directory for servlet mappings.
    Affected if The JDBC Test Servlet is deployed and registered in the application server.
  3. Verify if JDBC Test Servlet is enabled
    Check the servlet configuration in the SAP NetWeaver JAVA deployment descriptors or SAP Central Configuration Console. Confirm the servlet status is 'enabled' or 'active'.
    Affected if The JDBC Test Servlet is currently enabled on the system.
  4. Check servlet access controls
    Inspect the security constraints and access control configurations for the JDBC Test Servlet in the web.xml or SAP Internet Transaction Server (ITS) settings. Determine if the servlet allows unauthenticated access.
    Affected if The JDBC Test Servlet is accessible without authentication (no login required).

You are affected if SAP NetWeaver JAVA is running a vulnerable version AND the JDBC Test Servlet is enabled and accessible to unauthenticated users, allowing reflected XSS execution via crafted URLs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply SAP security patches for the JDBC Test Servlet or disable the servlet if unused, and implement input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied parameters.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44746 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44746 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data