Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2026-44751

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-06-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Application server ABAP does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user allowing an attacker to execute a report generation command which could overwrite information belonging to another user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This has high impact on integrity with low impact on availability and no impact on confidentiality of the application.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The vulnerability exists in SAP ABAP Application Server where missing authorization checks allow an authenticated user to execute report generation commands that can overwrite information belonging to other users, leading to privilege escalation.

MitigationApply the relevant SAP security patch to implement proper authority checks in the ABAP report execution path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify SAP ABAP Application Server installation
    Run transaction SM51 in SAP GUI to list installed SAP application server instances and note the ABAP version release
    Affected if SAP ABAP Application Server is running and the installed version falls within the affected range (compare your version to the documented affected versions for this CVE)
  2. Verify report generation transaction authorization
    Use transaction SU53 immediately after a user attempts to run report generation (e.g., SE38, RSRT) to check authorization failures, or review role authorization data using transaction PFCG
    Affected if Users with report execution permissions can run reports without proper authorization object checks (S_RS_REPORT or similar ABAP authorization objects are missing or set to unrestricted values)
  3. Inspect user role assignments for report privileges
    Run transaction SUIM and filter by role, then check roles containing report generation transactions (SE38, SA38, RSRT) to identify overly permissive assignments
    Affected if Roles grant report execution authorizations without proper restriction to specific reports or users, allowing unauthorized access to other users data
  4. Review report generation logs for unauthorized access
    Check transaction SLG1 (Object: RS, Subobject: REPORT) or use transaction ST03N to review audit logs for report executions that may indicate cross-user data access
    Affected if Logs show report executions accessing data or overwriting outputs belonging to other users without proper authorization
  5. Test for authorization bypass in report execution
    As a low-privilege authenticated user, attempt to execute report generation via SE38/RSRT and specify output destinations or variants belonging to different users
    Affected if The system allows execution and overwrites or accesses data outside the authorized user scope without throwing authorization errors (check with SU53 after attempt)

Your environment is affected if SAP ABAP Application Server is running with a version within the affected range and report generation transactions allow execution without proper ABAP authorization object checks, enabling users to access or overwrite other users data.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant SAP security patch to implement proper authority checks in the ABAP report execution path.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44751 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44751 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data