CVE-2026-44795
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSpinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to 2026.1.0, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.3, unsafe YAML processing bypasses safe deserialization when using CloudFormation deployments or CloudFoundry baking. The use of a non-safe constructor allows arbitrary loading of Java classes, leading to remote code execution. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.0, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSpinnaker contains an unsafe YAML deserialization vulnerability in its CloudFormation deployment and CloudFoundry baking features. The YAML processing uses a non-safe constructor that bypasses safe deserialization protections, allowing arbitrary Java class loading and leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2025.3.3>= 2025.4.0, < 2025.4.4>= 2026.0.0, < 2026.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Spinnaker versionCheck the installed Spinnaker version via the halyard config or Kubernetes deployment manifests. Common locations: 'hal config version' command, or look for the Deck/Gate/Fiat service images/tags in your Kubernetes namespace.Affected if The installed version is < 2025.3.3, OR >= 2025.4.0 and < 2025.4.4, OR >= 2026.0.0 and < 2026.0.3
-
Verify CloudFormation deployment feature is enabledCheck Spinnaker configuration for CloudFormation provider enabled in 'hal config provider aws' or the clouddriver configuration. Look for 'cf' or 'cloudformation' in the enabled deployment strategies.Affected if CloudFormation deployment feature is enabled and the version is in any of the affected ranges listed above
-
Verify CloudFoundry baking feature is enabledExamine the clouddriver or rosco service configuration for CloudFoundry bake support. Check for 'cloudfoundry' entries in the provider configuration or bake settings.Affected if CloudFoundry baking feature is enabled and the version is in any of the affected ranges listed above
-
Confirm YAML processing is in use for these featuresReview the pipeline or task configuration that uses CloudFormation or CloudFoundry to confirm YAML input is processed. Check if custom templates or parameterized YAML files are loaded during deployment/baking.Affected if YAML files are processed by the CloudFormation or CloudFoundry features in a Spinnaker version within the affected ranges
You are affected if your Spinnaker version falls within the affected ranges AND either CloudFormation deployment or CloudFoundry baking features are enabled and process YAML input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2025.3.32025.4.42026.0.3
Upgrade Spinnaker to versions 2026.1.0, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, or 2025.3.3 or later to patch the unsafe YAML constructor. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict or disable CloudFormation deployments and CloudFoundry baking features until the upgrade can be applied.
Upgrade to Spinnaker 2026.1.0 (or 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, or 2025.3.3)
- 1. Identify your current Spinnaker version by checking the deployment configuration or Spinnaker UI
- 2. Plan the upgrade to one of the fixed versions: 2026.1.0, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, or 2025.3.3
- 3. Back up your Spinnaker configuration and persistent data
- 4. Execute the upgrade following the official Spinnaker upgrade documentation for your deployment method
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Spinnaker version in the UI or via CLI
- 6. Test CloudFormation deployments and CloudFoundry baking functionality to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44795 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44795 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data