CVE-2026-44800
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedConcurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Push Notifications allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
In the news
Third-party coverage- Microsoft July 2026 Patch Tuesday fixes massive 570 flaws, 3 zero-days
- Microsoft CVE Summary - Bleeping Computer
Surfaced from public web coverage — external links open in a new tab.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability exists in Windows Push Notifications where concurrent execution shares resources without proper synchronization. An authorized local attacker can exploit this improper synchronization to elevate privileges to a higher level, potentially gaining SYSTEM or administrative access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 10.0.22631.7376< 10.0.26100.8875< 10.0.26200.8875< 10.0.28000.2269< 10.0.26100.33158CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Windows build versionOpen Command Prompt or PowerShell and run 'winver' or 'systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Version"' to obtain the full build number (e.g., 10.0.22631.xxxx)Affected if The build number is lower than 10.0.22631.7376 (23h2), 10.0.26100.8875 (24h2), 10.0.26200.8875 (25h2), 10.0.28000.2269 (26h1), or 10.0.26100.33158 (Server 2025)
-
Identify Windows edition and branchRun 'winver' or check System Properties to confirm if the system is Windows 11 23h2, 24h2, 25h2, 26h1, or Windows Server 2025Affected if The system is one of the listed affected versions and the build number is below the corresponding patched build
-
Verify Windows Push Notification service presenceOpen Services (services.msc) and look for 'Windows Push Notifications User Service' or run 'Get-Service WpnUserService' in PowerShellAffected if The Windows Push Notifications User Service exists on the system (this component is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable)
The system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Windows 11 version (23h2/24h2/25h2/26h1) or Windows Server 2025 with a build number below the fixed versions AND has the Windows Push Notifications component present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped10.0.22631.737610.0.26100.887510.0.26100.33158
Apply available Windows security updates for Windows Push Notifications component. Prioritize patching systems with user accounts that could be leveraged for local privilege escalation attacks.
Windows 11 23h2 (10.0.22631.7376+), Windows 11 24h2 (10.0.26100.8875+), Windows 11 25h2 (10.0.26200.8875+), Windows 11 26h1 (10.0.28000.2269+), Windows Server 2025 (10.0.26100.33158+)
- Check current Windows version by running `winver` or `systeminfo | findstr /B /C:"OS Name" /C:"OS Version"`
- For Windows 11 23h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.22631.7376 or later via Windows Update or manually download the update from Microsoft Update Catalog
- For Windows 11 24h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.8875 or later via Windows Update or manually download the update from Microsoft Update Catalog
- For Windows 11 25h2: Upgrade to build 10.0.26200.8875 or later via Windows Update or manually download the update from Microsoft Update Catalog
- For Windows 11 26h1: Upgrade to build 10.0.28000.2269 or later via Windows Update or manually download the update from Microsoft Update Catalog
- For Windows Server 2025: Upgrade to build 10.0.26100.33158 or later via Windows Update or Windows Server Update Services (WSUS)
- Restart the system after applying the update
- Verify the fix by checking the installed build number matches or exceeds the target version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-44800 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-44800 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data