CVE-2026-45014
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApostropheCMS is an open-source Node.js content management system. Versions up to and including 4.29.0 are vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting via unsanitized user display name in draft version tooltip. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceApostropheCMS versions 4.29.0 and below contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability where user display names are not sanitized before being rendered in draft version tooltips. An authenticated user can inject malicious JavaScript payload into their display name, which executes when other users view content with the affected tooltip.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm ApostropheCMS installationSearch for package.json containing '@apostrophecms/cms' or look for 'apos' namespace references in the codebase or node_modules directoryAffected if ApostropheCMS is not found in the environment, this CVE does not apply
-
Determine installed versionExamine package.json or package-lock.json for the @apostrophecms/cms version entry and compare to 4.29.0Affected if The installed version is 4.29.0 or lower
-
Verify user account functionality is enabledCheck if user registration or account creation module is active by examining the app configuration for users module or by logging in as an authenticated userAffected if User accounts are not enabled or accessible, the attack vector does not exist
-
Confirm draft version tooltips are accessibleAccess the ApostropheCMS admin interface and navigate to any content that has draft versions, then hover over version information tooltipsAffected if Draft version tooltips are not rendered or accessible in the interface
If the installed ApostropheCMS version is 4.29.0 or below and users can modify their display names while the draft version tooltip feature is accessible, the environment is vulnerable to stored XSS via display name injection.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement output encoding/sanitization on user display names before rendering in tooltips. Until official patches are released, consider adding Content Security Policy headers and reviewing all user-supplied input fields for proper escaping.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2026-45014 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2026-45014 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data